Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmers (for example working for a charity, improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children).
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
These days, there has been an ongoing argument that voluntary activities should be an obligation for students in high school. I take the view that this idea is relatively reasonable except in several cases.
There are a plethora of benefits to this idea. First, since participating in community service give pupils more chance to explore the surrounding world, which in turn stimulate their curiosity or enrich their understanding. The teenager, for example, will never know thoroughly about how vivid nature is until joining the conservation campaigns, which provides practical observations. This evidence supports the view that these activities are enormously rewarding for the learning of students. Second, by implementing this idea, the school could educate their student how to be good citizens and show their respects to society. Indeed, teaching a child to be a good citizen is not simple; thus, adding voluntary work into the curriculum could raise not only the awareness of the significance of their help but also the inspiration to devote more to society.
However, this trend still has some drawbacks. Students are prone to be more stressed involving these voluntaries in addition to some obstacles in their study. If the school apply these activities without considering deliberately, it will trigger some issues such as the severe disputes from parents in virtue of their belief that their offsprings need more time to unwind. Therefore, holding voluntary activities should be proportionate to make sure enough leisure time for youngster to enjoy their lives.
All in all, the minor disadvantages will never prevent us from concluding that participating compulsorily voluntary work is not excessive, but extremely useful.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-19 | Ruveen Pathak | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-19 | Ruveen Pathak | 89 | view |
- The charts below show the percentage of monthly household income spent on various items by two different groups in one European country. 73
- The diagram illustrates the process that is used to manufacture bricks for the building industry.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- As children become adults, their social behaviour changes in some ways.What are the main differences between young children's behaviour and that of adults? To what extent are the changes that take place good? 61
- The diagram show how leather goods are produced. 84
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmers (for example working for a charity, improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children).To what extent do you agree or disagree?Give r 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 251, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nderstanding. The teenager, for example, will never know thoroughly about how viv...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, still, therefore, thus, for example, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1475.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48327137546 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92294977441 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624535315985 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.2251497361 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.461538462 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6923076923 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.69230769231 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135258849611 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0482986966756 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0356373148819 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0802921883566 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0354170262219 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.79 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.