Social services play a crucial role in fostering relationships within communities. It is contended that certain community activities, traditionally carried out voluntarily, should become integral components of school curricula. I am in full agreement with this notion, and in the subsequent paragraphs, I will provide compelling arguments to support my standpoint.
Firstly, engaging in community service equips students with invaluable life experiences and skills. For instance, when students actively participate in these activities, they acquire essential attributes like teamwork and cooperation, which they can then impart to their peers who may not have participated. Moreover, these acquired skills possess transferability, rendering them adaptable to various contexts, including future professional pursuits. This makes community service an enriching educational supplement that extends beyond the classroom.
Furthermore, mandatory community service contributes significantly to a student's socio-economic development. Consider the example of teaching sports or academic subjects to younger students. Such interactions foster meaningful connections within the community, leading to a more balanced and fulfilling social life. The cultivation of these relationships not only enhances one's personal growth but also forms the foundation for a socially conscious citizenry. Therefore, incorporating community service into high school programs is a means to promote comprehensive development in students.
It is important to address the counterargument that introducing compulsory community service might overwhelm students already grappling with rigorous academic schedules. However, by adopting a holistic approach to education, schools can ensure that community service complements rather than competes with academic pursuits. Proper planning and time management strategies can mitigate the risk of academic decline, allowing students to reap the benefits of both educational realms.
In conclusion, while some contend that the inclusion of community service in high school curricula could lead to academic strain, the numerous advantages it offers far outweigh these concerns. Compulsory community service not only imparts vital life skills but also strengthens socio-economic bonds and nurtures holistic development. When thoughtfully implemented, this integration creates well-rounded individuals equipped to excel academically and contribute meaningfully to their communities.
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmers for example working for a charity improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children To what extent do you agree or disagree Give r 73
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmers for example working for a charity improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children To what extent do you agree or disagree Give r 89
- some people beleive that unpaod community services should be a compulsory part of high school programmes 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 71, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a student' or simply 'students'?
Suggestion: a student; students
...ty service contributes significantly to a students socio-economic development. Consider th...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, then, therefore, well, while, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2184.0 1615.20841683 135% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 6.59818731118 5.12529762239 129% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32197173492 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.658610271903 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 671.4 506.74238477 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.0 1.60771543086 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.6525914839 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.333333333 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3888888889 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164389593513 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0520378019083 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0418357380032 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0898010067109 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0338587763703 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 13.0946893788 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 19.37 50.2224549098 39% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 21.0 12.4159519038 169% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.4 8.58950901804 133% => OK
difficult_words: 144.0 78.4519038076 184% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.