SOME PEOPLE BELIEVE THAT UNPAID COMMUNITY SERVICE SHOULD BE A COMPULSORY PAR OF HIGH SCHOOL PROGRAMMES (FOR EXAMPLE WORKING FOR CHARITY, IMPROVING THE NEIGHBOURHOOD OR TEACHING SPORT TO YOUNGER CHILDERN). TO WHAT EXTENT DO YOU AGREE OR DISAGREE?
To start with, I believe it is utmost important for high school students to get themselves involve in some voluntarily work. Firstly, they are at the perfect age to learn some valuable life skills. Most probably, after completing high school, adolescents might look for jobs or further education and there they need these skill to use rather to learn. Therefore, if upper schools make them to involve in some kinds for social work they learn the skills like how to communicate constructively at work or to understand other people emotions to gel with people. For example, according to a survey published in The Guardian, the schools who teach young adults these soft skills are more comfortable in their job interviews and can secure a decent job after graduation. I concede it might frustrate some tudents to work without money, however, getting a well paid job for the rest of life is worth more than few hours of unpaid work.
In addition to above, I would say, the high schoolers are more vulnerable among other school groups. They carried themselves away into inappropriate activities quickly, if they are not physically and mentally engaged. For high schools, the only best possible way to get them out from a bad circle is by making them engage into community services, because that’s where they come across to hard realities of life. Off course, it is the responsibility of the school to find which social work is best for an individual students. For example by sending a young adult to work few hours every week at food banks can make them realize the importance of food/money. Likewise, to make them help at homeless shelter, realise the worth of home. Yet some find this work forceful but I am fully convinced that by making it compulsory, schools not only have saved many teenagers from choosing some dark paths but also help communities in their noble causes.
To sum up, without any doubt, these volunteering programmes not only help students to secure a good job but also can be used as a strong tool to bring vulnerable students out of dangerous paths. Therefore, I would say all high schools should adopt these programmes in their curriculum to make their students a valuable part of the society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 317, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this skill' or 'these skills'?
Suggestion: this skill; these skills
...r further education and there they need these skill to use rather to learn. Therefore, if u...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 621, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g to a survey published in The Guardian, the schools who teach young adults these...
^^
Line 3, column 522, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'student'?
Suggestion: student
...h social work is best for an individual students. For example by sending a young adult t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 827, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... convinced that by making it compulsory, schools not only have saved many teenage...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, likewise, look, so, therefore, well, for example, in addition, to start with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1846.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 381.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84514435696 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59340164998 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561679790026 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 567.9 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.2103403532 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.066666667 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.46666666667 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224046835134 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0781492542389 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0497153190983 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142255787795 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0536360100598 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 66.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.