Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes (for example working for a charity, improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports for younger children).
While, for high school students, learning in class from teachers and acquiring knowledge from textbooks can be the most critical tasks, it is quite beneficial for them to participate in unpaid community service.
To begin with, volunteering in community provides teenagers with precious opportunities to communicate with others besides classmates and teachers in school and enables them to learn to cooperate in teams. When working for a charity, students will interact with people in poverty in the countryside and foster habits of helping others in need. Also, the activities organized by charity can not be achieved by only one person, and thus teamwork is extremely essential. The ability to make plans and contacting the local government require proficient and effective talking skills. Therefore, considering those advantages mentioned above, high school programmes should make community service a compulsory part.
Besides, admittedly community service may take up a great deal of time which is supposed to spend on studying. Some people contend that the only goal for high school students is to concentrate on subjects and examinations and the service deprives them of much time. Nevertheless, those service in the volunteer work can relax students and contribute to high efficiency in studying. Students need those activities to relieve pressure, inspire them about the beauty of the world, and offer them confidence when depressed. During teaching sports for younger children, they can be real teachers and impart knowledge, which can significantly enlighten them and result in more confidence.
All in all, although unpaid community service requires time and energy, not only can students learn to work cooperate with other people, they can also gain confidence.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-24 | shayma | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | mikeboss268 | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-16 | Sohaib270 | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-04 | Chandrakumar Chanthujan | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-26 | Mihir Rami | 78 | view |
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. 67
- The charts below give information about USA marriage and divorce rates between 1970 and 2000, and the marital status of adult America in two of the years. 78
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. 56
- The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparis 78
- It is primarily through our identification with social groups that we define ourselves. 58
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1511.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55514705882 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85428400402 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584558823529 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.953144345 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.916666667 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314707020514 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108249908467 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0870798510112 0.0667982634062 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181631007815 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0621415165849 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.89 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.