Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes (for example working for a charity, improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children).
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Young generations are becoming selfish and losing the sense of responsibility. Society complains about teenagers’ rudeness and questions what the problem is in education system. Some people think high school should pay the bill for the negligence of teenagers’ ethic education. Even there is an idea that high school compulsory program should include free community service. I think it’s a wise idea which could make benefits in lot aspects.
The advantages of undertaking community service program in high school are apparent. Firstly, such a school program could help government to cut the fiscal expenditure. Every year, government would spend a huge fund on public service which includes community service. The work of this kind of service is not complicated, but it requires a large number of people to do it in long term. If one student spent one-class time (or 1 or 2 hours) on the service each week, it would help society save labor force. Secondly, doing community service is a good way to teach students to take social responsibility. Most teenagers may no longer do housework nowadays, however they have to prepare themselves to enter adult’s life. The community service program could contain looking after elderly in neighbouthood, cleaning the street and cooking for the poor. These works would train students’ life skills and also build their sense of social responsibility.
The lastly, the community service teaches students to understand the need of other people, they may consider others more in later life.
Beside the above points, I believe there are some other benefits we can gain from the measurement and it’s necessary to undertake the program. Also the adoption of community service as a compulsory part of high school program is meaningful to education development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-08-13 | mary.ssherr | 89 | view |
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school.Do the advantages of this outweight the disadvantages? 67
- Research indicates that the characteristics we are born with have much more influence on our personality and development than any experiences we may have in our life.Which do you consider to be the major influence? 80
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes (for example working for a charity, improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children).To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- Some people think that universities should provide graduates with the knowledge and skills needed in the workplace. Others think that the true function of a university should be to give access to knowledge for its own sake, regardless of whether the cours 89
- Government should spend money on railways rather than roads.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 20
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 338, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ice is not complicated, but it requires a large number of people to do it in long term. If one st...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 149, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...s;s necessary to undertake the program. Also the adoption of community service as a ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, lastly, look, may, second, secondly, so, i think, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1542.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35416666667 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98251560022 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600694444444 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 20.2991468619 49.4020404114 41% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.7058823529 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9411764706 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.70588235294 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234435689309 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0769719613289 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.063300425726 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134910588388 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0400669132514 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.