It is commonly argued that the travellers should accept and apply the tradition and culture which are pertain to the places they visit or else they continue with their own habits and the country should be open to new fashions. I agree with the host country embrace turists’ behaviour.
On the one hand, nationality is not the most popular thing anymore in the 21st century due to the interference of many races and nations. People are not belong to one culture or even one continent any longer and they regard themselves as a world citizen. So, a host country should be accessible to different, innovater, improver and maybe instructive cultures which will come with the visitors. Obviously, new customs accorporate several features to the home owner and more people want to travel this open mind country . This welcome is good for both the country and the visitors because of the feeling of coalescence.
On the other hand, it is normal that the host countries want to conservate their local customs for next generation from external influences. Also, culture of a country can be corrupt with the effect of visitors such as deteriotion of cultural places by crowded and religious rituels become an object of derision. Owing to this, local customs and behaviours should be preservative by their possessors, not allowing turists to continue their own traditions. Eventually, it is accurate that country exposed to distinctions although a country avoid themselves to cultural differences.
In conclude, many people think that visitors perform their own customs in where they travel while the others think they should not and follow the local traditions. I think, a country should be okey with different cultures and permit to the visitors.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 103, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'pertained'.
Suggestion: pertained
...ply the tradition and culture which are pertain to the places they visit or else they c...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 519, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...le want to travel this open mind country . This welcome is good for both the count...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, so, while, i think, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1465.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14035087719 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72354281431 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529824561404 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 450.0 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8874155237 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.692307692 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9230769231 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.69230769231 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.438757720243 0.244688304435 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154800853196 0.084324248473 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0780503200182 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.287122631403 0.151304729494 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0880246242734 0.056905535591 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.