Some people believe that when designing a building, the most important thing to be considered is the function rather than the outward appearance. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people believe that the function of building is the key aspect that homeowners should take into account when they design a dwelling place rather than the outside look. I personally agree with this view for some reasons that I will elaborate in this essay.
On the one hand, the tendency of choosing the aesthetically pleasing appearance is that it reflects the social status to show off the individual’s wealth and achievement. Seemingly, this may evoke the wider socioeconomic disparity in outdoor building performances which can influence the trend of modern architectural design without considering its functions. Furthermore, the different impressions between the aesthetic residence together with conventional homes style consist in the higher materials budgets and taxes which are imposed on them. For instance, the housing developers set out to create residential areas with a European classic design since they may attract more community’s attention, despite involving surplus construction costs and maintenance processes.
On the other hand, it seems to me that a well-designed functional building should be constructed by prioritising the purposes and needs of the occupant. In the modern era, a great number of people are getting involved in eco-friendly homes which take advantage of space savings. Sweden, particularly, converts old property to high efficiency that homeowners may design self-sufficient in their own energies. Furthermore, selecting materials can be considered as a factor of building resilience to minimise repair costs of both seasonal changes and disaster forecasts. It appears in earthquake zones, Japan, the construction is determined by three major designs, concerning rubber layer and seismic isolator.
In summary, it seems to me that functional designs are more important to consider for societies due to positive impacts that the utilization fits into their demand and can have a resilient residential construction. This is as long as the artistic style of building remains in the balanced expense prices.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-24 | MEBC Class | 89 | view |
| 2022-11-24 | Mollymaul | 78 | view |
| 2017-07-13 | Thao Anh194 | 81 | view |
- Doctors recommend that older people should exercise regularly However many of them do not exercise enough What are the causes What can be done to encourage them to exercise 70
- Robots can free people from difficult and dangerous work However some people are worried about the possible dangers robots may create Discuss the benefits of using robots and the possible dangers from it 89
- As major cities around the world are growing so are their problems What are these problems for young people living in cities What are possible solutions for these problems 84
- These days many people keep pets like dogs and cats as companions at their houses and this trend is getting popular Why do you think pet ownership is increasing What are the advantages of keeping pets as companions 84
- The noise level around us is constantly increasing and affecting the quality of our lives What causes the everyday noise that many people face What can be done about it 100
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, look, may, so, well, for instance, in summary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1754.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.65806451613 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15568297958 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61935483871 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.402055233 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.923076923 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8461538462 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.23076923077 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222031424728 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0682974642587 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0669040745775 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136013777073 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0676653439192 0.056905535591 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.43 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, look, may, so, well, for instance, in summary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1754.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.65806451613 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15568297958 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61935483871 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.402055233 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.923076923 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8461538462 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.23076923077 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222031424728 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0682974642587 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0669040745775 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136013777073 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0676653439192 0.056905535591 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.43 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.