Some people believe women make better leaders than men in companies or government.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Women are believed to be better than men at being leaders in companies or governments. This statement is entirely not true as effective leadership is governed not by gender but other factors that primarily comprise of leading skills and experience.
There are numerous examples of competent leaders across the world of both genders to give credence the fact the gender differences in leading positions have little connection with the leading ability. To illustrate, the prime example of a visionary and capable female leader is Ms. Merkel, the German chancellor who was able to sustain and foster the economic growth of Germany throughout her term in the office, and the same was also evident with the president Obama of United State who admirably succeeded in helping the US economy recover from the economic crisis.
Furthermore, it is well documented that the majority of successful leaders share certain common qualities, such as decisiveness, determination, high-order cognitive skills, as well as experience and none of these characteristics pertain to the gender element. As a result, were a female who is responsible for leading an organization to a goal unable to demonstrate sufficient experience in handling unforeseeable situations or lacked leading skills, failures would likely be inevitable for that group. For this reason, it is safe to conclude both men and women have an equal chance of becoming a great leader although in certain cases, each gender has a slight advantage over the other. For example, female managers are more empathetic to their workers, thus being more adept at motiving employees than their male counterparts, whereas males are somewhat better at producing rational decisions.
in conclusion, it is readily apparent that gender has little influence over the ability to lead a group successfully, and in fact strong leadership requires a person to possess other vital traits and accumulate a wealth of experience to handle unexpected hardships.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-15 | vidung | 92 | view |
| 2021-10-24 | Lunar Tran | 73 | view |
| 2021-10-24 | Lunar Tran | 78 | view |
| 2021-10-05 | hailinh | 89 | view |
| 2020-10-03 | mina123356789 | 73 | view |
- Keeping animals in the zoo is the best way to protect wild animals Do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people think thay the tendency of human beings to copy one another is shown in the popularity of fashion clothes and other consumer goods To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people think thay the tendency of human beings to copy one another is shown in the popularity of fashion clothes and other consumer goods To what extent do you agree or disagree 87
- Some people say that too much time and resources are spent on the protection of wild animals and birds To what extent do you agree or disagree 90
- Each Year the Crime Rate Increases What Are the Causes of Crime and What Could Be Done to Prevent This Rise in Criminal Activity 92
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 207, Rule ID: COMPRISE_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprise' or 'consist of'?
Suggestion: comprise; consist of
...gender but other factors that primarily comprise of leading skills and experience. There...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...ter at producing rational decisions. in conclusion, it is readily apparent that...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, thus, well, whereas, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1681.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38782051282 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97441250781 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605769230769 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 540.0 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 20.2975951904 168% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.5125755598 49.4020404114 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 186.777777778 106.682146367 175% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.6666666667 20.7667163134 167% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.5555555556 7.06120827912 192% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115284713644 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0596100471771 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0920585031031 0.0667982634062 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.081143776383 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0884534638336 0.056905535591 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.3 13.0946893788 163% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.51 50.2224549098 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.7 11.3001002004 157% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.69 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.1190380762 154% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.