Some people believe that women should play an equal role as mean in a country s police force or military force such as the army while others think women are not suitable for these kinds of jobs Discuss both views and give your opinion

Some people believe that military and police environment requires considerable physical and mental strength and thus unsuitable for women. Personally, I think women are able to handle the similar role to male in this job, and I will explain why.
One the one hand, women’s physical ability is often considered biologically inferior to men. Working in military means that the soldiers have to carry and handle extraordinary heavy weapons and other equipment. Besides, the practicing activities in the army and police are often strenuous, which might quickly wear female personnel out. Therefore, many people think this job is more suitable for men.
Nonetheless, I do not find the above-mention opinions sensible. Firstly, the military and police environment nowadays do not merely require physical agility and strength. With the advancement of technology, remote-controlled machines and weapons can perform even better than humans. For example, autonomous drones are able to detect and attack multitargets effectively while in the past, it might risk a military troop to do the same job. Similarly, sophisticated devices can help police officers trace the criminal more quickly. Hence, I think any well-trained officer, despite his or her gender, can handle the job. Secondly, there is no evidence to say that women are inferior to men in decision making and managing abilities, which often require intellectual skills instead of physical strength. We can see it in the way that numerous female world leaders have outperformed their male opponents.
In conclusion, while some people think women should not be given the same roles to their partners in military and police forces, I am convinced that this is an outdated gender prejudice, and women are able to do this job as well as men.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, firstly, hence, nonetheless, second, secondly, similarly, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, i think, in conclusion, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1508.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30985915493 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90478232661 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584507042254 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8032976942 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.533333333 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9333333333 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3333333333 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266373676168 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0817025656393 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0729899616091 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190660123941 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0645106316548 0.056905535591 113% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.