In this contemporary era, foreign film actors and celebs have taken a paramount position in youngsters' life with the least interest in popular historical persons passed away from their native country. If pondered, there are several root causes attributed to this and few precautionary steps could be implemented to cope-up. Both the aspects are elaborated in the ensuing paragraphs.
Out of all posible causes some could be more responsible than other, the foremost one is that technological advancement in the film industry. By this i mean that the upgraded electronic gadgets such as cameras and computer softwares make film more interesting and exaggerate the original look of the actors and make them more attractive with adding effects. Due to this indegenious traditional films not only overlooked by the youth but also vanished from the storage. Apart from this, majority of literature available in written formate rather than in audio-visual about the people was in debate at the yesteryears. One recent movie based on the life of Sardar Patel heat the profit of most of the cinemas across India
as he is and former political leader of early ninties and sacrifies a lot in struggle of independent; but, one existing film created by the same content is not even know the public . This is a clear illustration of people want a updated features, if it is not given they choose a current trend to follow.
Nonetheless, by some corrective measures youth can bemome history oriented. Firstly, awarness can be spreaded to the society members at their childhood about history by various way. To explain, historical people should be discussed in the school curriculum; thus, at latter life adults could become fascinated to further exploration about what they studied theorical in their earlier life. Secondly, government should promote the historical individuals by putting their statues on the public gathering, place their quotes on the hordings and banners on the congestive places and advertise them on printed and virtual media.
To conclude, it can be eventually said that by the modern technology, former real-hero from the native country had been forgotten; but, using available facilities wisely we can easily re-develope interest.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 150, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...vancement in the film industry. By this i mean that the upgraded electronic gadge...
^
Line 2, column 719, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ofit of most of the cinemas across India as he is and former political leader of ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 182, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...same content is not even know the public . This is a clear illustration of people ...
^^
Line 3, column 229, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... is a clear illustration of people want a updated features, if it is not given th...
^
Line 4, column 33, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'measures'' or 'measure's'?
Suggestion: measures'; measure's
...llow. Nonetheless, by some corrective measures youth can bemome history oriented. Firs...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, look, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, thus, apart from, i mean, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1887.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 358.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27094972067 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83449965809 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620111731844 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 603.9 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.924580881 49.4020404114 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.785714286 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5714285714 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277746570242 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0783546076009 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0462333061747 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123678385908 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0514919221589 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.35 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 78.4519038076 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.