As we moving into the 21st century, world wide trade and communication become effortless. This can found worhwhile, according to one group of thinkers; whereas, few individuals believe that it could demage the uniqeness of nation. These both the side have their own explaination. Therefore, before commenting on my opinion both the sides are elborated in the ensuing paragraphs.
Discussing the former opinion, out of all the arguments the proponents put forword the principle one is that several foreign products are either not available easily or very expensive to buy. Due to mutual understanding and import-export to one another it may become affordable and easily availabe. Moreover, some time co-operation is found very significant to deal with some maticulous situation. Recent survey carried out by the world health organisation has concluded that after import of polio vaccine to India from China, the mortality rate by this disease had decline by 68%. This is a clear illustration of how the suppot of neighbourhood tackel the complex problems. A part from that cultural changes would be also better for several categories in this world. Nowadays English has been becoming common language for most of the countries; hence, language barrier for the researchers, students, doctors, engineers and journalists is reducing.
On the flip side, various uniqe qualities and monopolies would be exposed globally. This could become a downside for some giant organisations as their main source of economy is their personal developed formulas. They have spent a generation or more time to develope their business, this effort become worthless if they commence contacting with overseas companies. Additionaly, liberaliztion between any two nations might become strong point for third country and there may be high chances of dispute and terrerism.
To conclude and give my opinion, in this global village, colaboration on trade and culture have both merits as well as demerits. Thus, by limitations and with some regulation it would be a fruitful other wise very dangerous.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 37, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: worldwide
As we moving into the 21st century, world wide trade and communication become effortle...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 37, Rule ID: WORLD_WIDE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'worldwide'?
Suggestion: worldwide
As we moving into the 21st century, world wide trade and communication become effortle...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 109, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...n on trade and culture have both merits as well as demerits. Thus, by limitations and with...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 198, Rule ID: OTHER_WISE_OTHERWISE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'otherwise'?
Suggestion: otherwise
... some regulation it would be a fruitful other wise very dangerous.
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 225, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e a fruitful other wise very dangerous.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, third, thus, well, whereas, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1750.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4012345679 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93580662243 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648148148148 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 554.4 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9931233401 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.941176471 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0588235294 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41176470588 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128410213697 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0394457818434 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.036321252461 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0828330937413 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0261392763941 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.99 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.