Some people belive that employers should not be concerned about the way their employees dress, but the quality of work. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Essay topics:

Some people belive that employers should not be concerned about the way their employees dress, but the quality of work. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Over the past decades, workplace matters have never failed to draw public attention and provoke debates. Although the importance of dress code and appearance at work has been recognized and accepted, some people still argue that dressing is far less essential compared to work outcome. From my perspective, these are both matters of concern to employers and the performance of staff should be prioritized.

On the one hand, a dress code promotes a serious working atmosphere as well as contributes significantly to the improvement of professionalism in organizations. In contrast, inappropriate clothing can result in numerous negative consequences. For example, if an employees attend a meeting in informal clothes such as T-shirts and jeans, his collaborative partners may have a bad impression that he is unprofessional and disrespectful to them. As a result, they probably will reconsider the co-operation and the company may lose the contract. Another point to mention is that imposing a mandatory dress code in workplace can help avoid several troubles. Female workers, for instance, can be victims of sexual harassment and even abuse if they are not conscious about what they put on. With dress codes, these problems can be prevented or at least mitigated. This directly suggests that by putting some limitations on dressing up, workers will be less distracted from their main tasks, thereby enhancing work productivity.

On the other hand, it is crucial to lay more emphasis on work performance of employees. The reason is crystal- clear: work outcome is the main factor that drive the company’s thriving success. If the employer cares too much about the appearance and does not attach enough importance to the work results, his employees may be lazy and neglect their main tasks and when the quality of work decrease, the profits will also decline and setbacks may ensue. Moreover, working in an environment where work performance is prioritized, workers can find great enthusiasm to bring out the best of themselves to devote to the company. What can be inferred from this is that by emphasizing the importance of work performance, the employer can keep his subordinates on track, thus ensuring the smoothness and effectiveness of work.

To conclude, being an employer means that there are numerous matters need to be considered. While the work outcome is significantly essential, the superior also need to concern about how his employees dress and imposing an appropriate dress code may be the best solution to avoid related-problems.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-11-05 ht 67 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 260, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'an employee' or simply 'employees'?
Suggestion: an employee; employees
... negative consequences. For example, if an employees attend a meeting in informal clothes su...
^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, moreover, so, still, thus, well, while, at least, for example, for instance, in contrast, in fact, such as, as a result, as well as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2163.0 1615.20841683 134% => OK
No of words: 406.0 315.596192385 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3275862069 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48881294772 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1132576227 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554187192118 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 652.5 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.9610114829 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.166666667 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5555555556 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.44444444444 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282551411165 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0801759982009 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0605354490715 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17894429413 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.021381921373 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.