Most of the urgent problems can only be solved with international co-operation. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Over the past decades, international collaborations has never failed to draw public attention and provoke debates. Although co-operation between countries has proved to be an effective way to tackle important issues, the issue as to whether it is the only solution or not remains controversial. From my perspective, while this collaboration offers great benefits, it is unrealistic to believe that it is the key to all emerging problems.
On the one hand, a co-operation between a wide range of countries bears numerous positive consequences. As a collaboration allows complex issues to reach the global level, it can help to gather wisdom and resources to deal with those problems. For example, since environmental issues was considered a matter of concern to all countries, a series of international conference have been held to reduce pollution and some effective measures have been taken such as planting more trees and using alternative resources. another case in point is the international aid provider for people suffering from wars and natural disasters. The joint efforts of donor countries and the other organizations not only reduce the impact of humanitarian disasters but also relieve the hardships for those victims.
On the other hand, there are many cases that requires domestic resolution instead of co-operation between countries. For example, poverty, backward education and corruption are the issues which can be tackled by the government themselves. if the authorities rely to much on other countries to help, the nation itself may never develop independently. another point to mention is that international collaborations do not always yield desired results. Firstly, since other countries cannot provide help immediately, the problem may need a long time to be addressed. For example, if starvation occurs in a country, wating for other nations to help can result in numerous citizens died before receiving food aid.
To conclude, in the context of globalization, all countries have become interdependent on each other to address complex issues. However, over-reliance on other nations could be counterproductive way in the development progress of the country.
- Some people belive that employers should not be concerned about the way their employees dress, but the quality of work. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- Most of the urgent problems can only be solved with international co-operation. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- : It is more important for schoolchildren to learn about local history than world history. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 228, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...y to tackle important issues, the issue as to whether it is the only solution or not remains ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 515, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Another
... trees and using alternative resources. another case in point is the international aid ...
^^^^^^^
Line 15, column 241, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
... tackled by the government themselves. if the authorities rely to much on other c...
^^
Line 15, column 265, Rule ID: TO_TOO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
...nt themselves. if the authorities rely to much on other countries to help, the na...
^^
Line 15, column 352, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Another
...itself may never develop independently. another point to mention is that international ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, so, while, as to, for example, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1872.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.57142857143 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25044558039 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595238095238 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 583.2 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.8820234792 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.0 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122316729957 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0402225141781 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0281058289525 0.0667982634062 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0702868598181 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0285525518607 0.056905535591 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.