Some people claim that it is acceptable to use animals in medical research for the benefit of human beings, while other people argue that it is wrong. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Nowadays, there are some ideas that people should be restricted from hunting animals who are considered the same as humans, however others think that animals have responded the demand of humans to specialize food and experiments. In my point of view, both of two opinion have advantages and they can bring for us various benefits if they be applied appropriately.
On the one hand, animals should be prevented from the overexploitation of humans. To begin with, if people hunt too much animals without the reasonable prevention, it can bring a bad impact on the environment. Because the existence of all animals can cause negative effects to our life. To particular, many countries use some animals or insects like the enemy of pests that destroy agriculture instead of using the chemical pesticides. In addition, the overexploitation of humans will make the diversity of biology go down. A variety of wild animals were extinct due to the hunting of people. For example, in some African nations, a large number of elephants have been exploited to satisfy the demand of people which are unnecessary and unreasonable. this phenomenon reduce enormously the elephants in Africa that are the symbolize of this area for a long period.
On the other hand, animals play an important role that can not changed or removed by any measures. The animals provide to humans various nutrients like protein what is one of the most necessary nutrition of people. In modern industry, a variety of scientific works are invented to make the another "protein" for humans not the protein from animals however, the efficiency of them can not changed the uses of animals. Furthermore, people also need animals for the research demand. To illustrate, the scientists use them in the experiments to analyze and invent the medicine or other scientific intention.
In conclusion, animals are considered that they should not be hunted too much by humans and should have the same position like us but others argue that animals must satisfy the demand of humans such as food and research. In my opinion, two views are have positive and effective in our life if they are directed properly and satisfactory.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-30 | stereouniverse | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-14 | dangg_khoa15 | 11 | view |
| 2023-01-25 | giangngoc | 56 | view |
| 2022-09-21 | @evelyn_2810 | 73 | view |
| 2021-10-01 | nguyenanhanhanh | 56 | view |
- Some people claim that it is acceptable to use animals in medical research for the benefit of human beings while other people argue that it is wrong Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- A growing number of people feel that animal should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs including uses for food and research 73
- A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs including for food and research Discuss both view and give your opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 173, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...others think that animals have responded the demand of humans to specialize food...
^^
Line 1, column 209, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nded the demand of humans to specialize food and experiments. In my point of vie...
^^
Line 3, column 117, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...mans. To begin with, if people hunt too much animals without the reasonable preventi...
^^^^
Line 3, column 211, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... bring a bad impact on the environment. Because the existence of all animals can cause ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 632, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
.... For example, in some African nations, a large number of elephants have been exploited to satisf...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 752, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...which are unnecessary and unreasonable. this phenomenon reduce enormously the elepha...
^^^^
Line 3, column 819, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...mously the elephants in Africa that are the symbolize of this area for a long period. On t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 63, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mals play an important role that can not changed or removed by any measures. The ...
^^
Line 5, column 400, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'change'
Suggestion: change
...however, the efficiency of them can not changed the uses of animals. Furthermore, peopl...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 251, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
... research. In my opinion, two views are have positive and effective in our life if t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, so, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1838.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 360.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10555555556 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91875586551 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513888888889 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 602.1 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.414819044 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.117647059 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1764705882 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.11764705882 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 5.01903807615 199% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305376630111 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0924548235328 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0564937420661 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194996208492 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0336489598185 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.