Some people claim that it is acceptable to use animals in medical research for the benefit of human beings, while other people argue that it is wrong. Discuss both views and give your opinion
While some people contend that vivo testing for medical purposes is satisfactory, I am of the opinion that such experimental trials on animals are unacceptable because they both violate animals’ right to live and are unethical.
On the one hand, there are a number of reasons why some think that using animals for medical research is acceptable. The first reason is that animal testing plays an important role in the medical field. In fact, over the past few decades, there has been a wide range of medical breakthroughs in consequence of testing medicines on animals , which has saved millions of lives. For example, according to some surveys, the measles vaccine, which was developed by using animal testing, has saved over 20 million people since 2000. Another reason is that if new drugs are not tested at all or were tested on humans first, it could lead to serious consequences. For instance, some people chosen to test a new vaccine which is not tested on animals could have some serious symptoms such as shortness of breath… or even they could die.
On the other hand, I would argue that animals should not be tested for the benefit of humans. Firstly, Since animals have their own rights, their lives should be respected. This means that scientists have no moral right to use them in our research. Secondly, laboratory animals often have to be subjected to toxic substances, which can cause them pain, distress or even death. Annually, millions of lab mice, for example, become deformed or die after being subjected to such tests.
In conclusion, although some people think that medical experiments on animals for the benefit of humans, I personally believe that using animals for medical studies is not acceptable.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-30 | stereouniverse | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-14 | dangg_khoa15 | 11 | view |
| 2023-01-25 | giangngoc | 56 | view |
| 2022-09-21 | @evelyn_2810 | 73 | view |
| 2021-10-01 | nguyenanhanhanh | 56 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 216, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...role in the medical field. In fact, over the past few decades, there has been a w...
^^
Line 2, column 318, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... breakthroughs in consequence of testing medicines on animals , which has saved ...
^^
Line 2, column 340, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...equence of testing medicines on animals , which has saved millions of lives. For...
^^
Line 2, column 358, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... medicines on animals , which has saved millions of lives. For example, accordin...
^^
Line 2, column 423, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'measles'' or 'measle's'?
Suggestion: measles'; measle's
...example, according to some surveys, the measles vaccine, which was developed by using a...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 565, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...000. Another reason is that if new drugs are not tested at all or were tested on ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1444.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99653979239 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58064689693 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557093425606 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.432048225 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.076923077 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2307692308 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.69230769231 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.337003932288 0.244688304435 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126361889669 0.084324248473 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0879129692225 0.0667982634062 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229398539728 0.151304729494 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0492594987982 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.