Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.
To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?
In recent years, the amount of household waste recycled is relatively limited. While I agree with the view that authorities should make legal requirements to encourage people to reuse, I do not think this is the only method that governments can do to address the problem.
First and foremost, enacting a recycling law can be an effective way to improve the environment. After using plastic or aluminum bottles, people have a tendency to throw them away because it is much faster than recycling. People often think it will take their time if they have to wash the cans and crush them to recycle. Therefore, imposing legal restrictions would highly motivated citizens to adopt a more responsible attitude to reuse. Because if they are not self-conscious to do it, they could be punished or even imprisoned for repeated offenders. As a result, recycling laws will contribute to a cleaner and fresher environment.
On the other hand, the authority could take other appropriate measures in addition to punishment. Firstly, the state can offer some rewards or discount tickets for people who recycle many times. Take China as an example; residents in this country will exchange their reused products for music tickets. This helps the country cut down a large amount of their household waste output. Besides, the government can raise people’s awareness through education. For example, children should be properly taught about the crucial role of recycling in preserving the environment and how to convert waste into usable products.
In conclusion, governments do need to enact legal requirements but this is not the only viable solution. They can reward their residents or focus on education as an alternative approach.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-29 | nobitaa | 84 | view |
| 2024-06-10 | ThHuong | 61 | view |
| 2024-06-10 | ThHuong | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-19 | paniz_kiani | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-19 | paniz_kiani | 56 | view |
- Some people believe that online newspapers will one day replace traditional print newspapers completely. What is your opinion? 89
- The diagrams show how a fire extinguisher works 92
- The world is experiencing a dramatic increase in population, which is causing problems not only for poor, undeveloped countries, but also for industrialised and developed nations. Describe some of the problems that overpopulation causes, and suggest at le 78
- Earlier technological development brought more changes to the life of ordinary people than recent technological development does. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree?What other measures do you think might be effective? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 375, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'motivate'
Suggestion: motivate
...mposing legal restrictions would highly motivated citizens to adopt a more responsible at...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, firstly, if, so, therefore, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1460.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27075812274 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86613043971 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617328519856 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.4312750308 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.25 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3125 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.9375 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317904424067 0.244688304435 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0907327150583 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0500239713594 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187986342246 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0371577391827 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.