Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.
To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?
Some people feel that there is not enough residential waste recycled. They argue that recycling can only be increased if people are legally required to participate. However, I do not think legislation is needed at all. For one thing, low participation in recycling is mainly the result of its inconvenience. For another, awareness campaigns can achieve the same result as legislation does.
It is inconvenient for many people to recycle their household waste. Many people do not actively engage in recycling, not because it is not a mandate but because they do not have access to curbside recycling. If they want to participate, they have to travel long distances to find a recycling center, which discourages them from being active recyclers. Thus, if governments make recycling facilities more accessible, participation will improve greatly even without any legal requirements.
In addition, awareness campaigns can be as effective as laws. It is true that If laws mandate recycling, people will be more aware of its importance. However, this can also be accomplished through awareness campaigns. For example, governments can campaign on social media platforms against the damage that residential waste has caused to this planet. In this way, more people will become alert to the waste crisis this planet is facing and start participating in recycling as a result.
In conclusion, I believe it is completely unnecessary to use laws to increase household recycling since recycling is unpopular mainly because it is inconvenient. Besides, awareness campaigns can have the same effectiveness as laws.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-29 | nobitaa | 84 | view |
| 2024-06-10 | ThHuong | 61 | view |
| 2024-06-10 | ThHuong | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-19 | paniz_kiani | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-19 | paniz_kiani | 56 | view |
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste 56
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled they say that the only way to increase recycling is for government to make it a legal requirement to what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more off their waist 78
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste 56
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste 78
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, so, thus, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, for one thing, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1358.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 251.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41035856574 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12680734549 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561752988048 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 440.1 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.4133309017 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.875 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6875 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.625 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.384857871307 0.244688304435 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122014236744 0.084324248473 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0893313701161 0.0667982634062 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227233820222 0.151304729494 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0812099817218 0.056905535591 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 39.33 50.2224549098 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.8 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, so, thus, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, for one thing, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1358.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 251.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41035856574 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12680734549 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561752988048 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 440.1 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.4133309017 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.875 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6875 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.625 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.384857871307 0.244688304435 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122014236744 0.084324248473 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0893313701161 0.0667982634062 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227233820222 0.151304729494 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0812099817218 0.056905535591 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 39.33 50.2224549098 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.8 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.