Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.
There is much discussion about recycling waste from domestic homes in today's society. Some hold the view that the authority should make a law to force residents to recycle more waste. From my point of view, while I am in favor of the idea that recycling is essential for human lives, I suppose that there is no need to create an obligation of recycling.
On the one hand, there are many reasons why people should recycle more waste. First and foremost, recycling may help the public to reduce the expenditure on new things for life requirements. It can be explained by the fact that if people renew a bottle into a vase for planting flowers, they do not need to buy a new vase. As a result, individuals may save lots of money to serve other vital purposes. Another compelling reason is that recycling plays a pivotal role in protecting the environment. This is because when a great amount of waste is thrown away indiscriminately, nature has to suffer a severe impact and may be contaminated. In contrast, they can conserve the environment and everything surrounding them.
On the other hand, although it is important to recycle waste, I reckon that a legal requirement is not necessary in this circumstance. The primary rationale is that there may be some kinds of waste that are valueless or not worth recycling. If people are forced to renew them to use, it may create a reverse impact on themselves, which means that they have to use low-quality items that leads to poor quality of life. Furthermore, recycling should come from personal awareness. This is because awareness is the initial factor that makes a contribution to recycling some things. If people do not want to recycle waste, it is pointless for the government to make a law for this, which may even lead to the dissatisfaction of the dwellers.
In conclusion, the trend of recycling waste is progressively increasing in recent years. I firmly believe that recycling is a vital part of life and it should be resulted from each individual's awareness instead of by law.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-29 | nobitaa | 84 | view |
| 2024-06-10 | ThHuong | 61 | view |
| 2024-06-10 | ThHuong | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-19 | paniz_kiani | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-19 | paniz_kiani | 56 | view |
- The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020 with predictions for 2030 and 2040 84
- The line graph below shows the oil production and consumption in China between 1982 and 2006
- Some universities offer online courses as an alternative to classes delivered on campus Do you think this is a positive or negative development 78
- In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport Discuss both view 61
- These days too many people maintain their health by relying on doctors and medicine rather than by following a healthy lifestyle To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 182, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...ife and it should be resulted from each individuals awareness instead of by law.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, may, so, well, while, as to, i reckon, i suppose, in conclusion, in contrast, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1691.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 352.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80397727273 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89020720959 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525568181818 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 546.3 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.1247641501 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.9444444444 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5555555556 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.61111111111 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.362221207997 0.244688304435 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11051232416 0.084324248473 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0602314639835 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221080587605 0.151304729494 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0536318467878 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 182, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...ife and it should be resulted from each individuals awareness instead of by law.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, may, so, well, while, as to, i reckon, i suppose, in conclusion, in contrast, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1691.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 352.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80397727273 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89020720959 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525568181818 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 546.3 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.1247641501 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.9444444444 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5555555556 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.61111111111 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.362221207997 0.244688304435 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11051232416 0.084324248473 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0602314639835 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221080587605 0.151304729494 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0536318467878 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.