Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement. To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?
It is sometimes argued that the executive branch should force people to reprocess their rubbish in their homes. While I disagree with the idea of making such programmes compulsory, I do believe that recycling the rubbish is the best way to preserve the environment.
On the one hand, laws are necessary to make civilizations abide by the rules of reusing the waste. Firstly, people will establish a good habit of increasing recycling the waste when they have to adhere to the regulation frequently. As a result, this activity makes the country become less garbage than before and save a huge of resources. Singapore is a good example for this trend since they have a numerous ways to reduce the waste. Secondly, this is the only solution to decrease the amount of waste. People often carry out the rule when the punishment or fine is given, not from their conscience, so, the legal requirement is effective.
On the other hand, this compulsory rule can brings some drawbacks. First and foremost, forcing people is out of democracy as people are living in the age of independence so the decisions often from the giving of civilizations. Consequently, this will lead to many complaints, strikes and meetings. Secondly, not only people but also the governments need to play an significant role for this trend. They should insert many kinds of waste bin nooks and cranny’s in country or building factory to transport garbage to power, fertilizer.
In conclusion, all the civilizations should aware of the prominence of waste recycling. In some case, the governments should give the legal obligation to enhance people’s responsibility, but this is also the disadvantaged solution because of some reasons mentioned above.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-29 | nobitaa | 84 | view |
| 2024-06-10 | ThHuong | 61 | view |
| 2024-06-10 | ThHuong | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-19 | paniz_kiani | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-19 | paniz_kiani | 56 | view |
- The charts below show the results of a survey of adult education. The first chart shows the reasons why adults decide to study. The pie chart shows how people think the costs of adult education should be shared. 80
- The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999. 56
- The diagram below give information about two road tunnels in one Australian city 92
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries. 78
- In the future, students may have the choice of studying at home by using technology such as computers or television or of studying at traditional schools. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 59
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 410, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'way'?
Suggestion: way
...r this trend since they have a numerous ways to reduce the waste. Secondly, this is ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 45, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'bring'
Suggestion: bring
...he other hand, this compulsory rule can brings some drawbacks. First and foremost, for...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 363, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...e but also the governments need to play an significant role for this trend. They s...
^^
Line 7, column 278, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ecause of some reasons mentioned above.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, while, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1455.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15957446809 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98435174102 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574468085106 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.1242872605 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.0 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.93333333333 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292098833737 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0839205008958 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0512884067358 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164065395381 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0368375105616 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.