It is often argued that the only method to increase recycling is introducing new legislation to force people to recycle. In my opinion, I do not agree that making a recycling law will only help the government.
In my opinion, recycling law can be one way to tackle recycling issue. Government can make it a legal obligation for householders to separate the dustbins. There could be punishment who fail to adhere the law such as from a small fine to community services or even imprisonment for repeat offenders. These measures will act as a deterrent and encourage the householders to follow the law. As a result, improved behaviour of house-owners could lead to a clean and green environment for everyone.
However, I believe introducing recycling law is not the only method, government should adopt to increase recycling. Instead, recycling could be improved by providing awareness rather punishment. For instance, children could taught about recycling in school or house-owners can be informed or educated about the impact of house waste on the environment by organizing awareness campaigns. Another tactic, government could adopt is creating strict regulations for the companies who produce household packages. Finally, the government could invest money to develop technology, which will automatically do the recycling process even if the house owners do not separate waste. As a result, the recycling issue will be encountered without implicating law on the public.
To Conclude, I think recycling law is not the only method to increase recycling process, while other methods can be adapted to make the environment clean and waste-free.
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement. To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their was 56
- You recently organised an all-day event for your company, which took place in a local hotel. In their feedback , participants at the meeting said that they liked the hotel, but there were unhappy about the food that was served for lunch.letter to a manage 73
- Some people say that now we can see films on our phones or tablets there is no need to go to the cinema. Others say that to be fully enjoyed, films need to be seen in a cinema. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 56
- You work for an international company and would like to spend six months working in its head office in another country. 73
- Nowadays, there is a trend that reports of media focus on problems and emergencies rather than positive development. Some people think it is harmful to individuals and to society. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 88, Rule ID: ADOPT_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'adapt to'?
Suggestion: adapt to
... not the only method, government should adopt to increase recycling. Instead, recycling ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 225, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'teach'
Suggestion: teach
...unishment. For instance, children could taught about recycling in school or house-owne...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, so, while, for instance, i think, such as, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1394.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36153846154 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07383498881 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530769230769 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 440.1 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.1504791511 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.5714285714 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5714285714 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29456270178 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112330591248 0.084324248473 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0664200852498 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210150562858 0.151304729494 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0379498871142 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.