Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.
To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
While domestic wastes used to be not a matter of obsession, recently it has been a harsh problem for many nations across the globe. A proportion of people are of the opinion that a considerable amount of household wastes are not being appropriately recycled. Therefore, they believe that this might be the supervisory role of the governments to enact laws so as to monitor the process of packing homes wastes. Although forcing people to recycle their stuff might solve the problem to some extent, it seems wide variety of alternative methods, however, can be more effective.
Opponents of this scheme claim that legislating tough and strict laws has always been effective.
One theory that supporters put forward is that people not only obey all the regulations of gathering their wastes but they also encourage community to carry out all duties associated with recycling. In addition, people tend to be more respectful to laws these days than in the past.
Nevertheless, there might be couple of more and easy methods to persuade people to conduct the recycling process. One of the programs that can be taken into account is raising public awareness through media. Documentaries, movies and many TV shows as examples intended to inform residents of dire and degradable damages to natural ecosystems and human lives can readily awaken people towards considering the case.
Nowadays, there are more hazardous problems in our societies needed severe laws than recycling domestic wastes. It sounds that recycling household wastes is of more personal issue, and all the population must have a great sense of their community rather than being introduced a law for such matter.
To sum up, laws and mandatory regulations must be enacted more serious crimes, such as burglaries, terrorism and drug abuse. It seems the problem of recycling can be tackled via some laws. Still that should not be regarded as the mere solution.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-12 | Sonyainch | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | mirolinquency | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | Duong Linh | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-08 | ppatel | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-24 | rahulsd | 73 | view |
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their wa 78
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compariso 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 357, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...y role of the governments to enact laws so as to monitor the process of packing homes wa...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 190, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Still,
...recycling can be tackled via some laws. Still that should not be regarded as the mere...
^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'however', 'nevertheless', 'so', 'still', 'therefore', 'while', 'as to', 'in addition', 'such as', 'to sum up']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.24269005848 0.247107183377 98% => OK
Verbs: 0.178362573099 0.155533422707 115% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0818713450292 0.0946595960268 86% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0643274853801 0.0501214627716 128% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0292397660819 0.0437548338989 67% => OK
Prepositions: 0.116959064327 0.122226691241 96% => OK
Participles: 0.0730994152047 0.0403226058552 181% => Less participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.71016114409 2.80594681477 97% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0380116959064 0.0326793684256 116% => OK
Particles: 0.00584795321637 0.00163938923432 357% => OK
Determiners: 0.0789473684211 0.0861772015684 92% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0292397660819 0.021408717616 137% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00584795321637 0.011925033212 49% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1931.0 1933.35771543 100% => OK
No of words: 314.0 316.048096192 99% => OK
Chars per words: 6.14968152866 6.12580529183 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20517956788 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.388535031847 0.374742101984 104% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.286624203822 0.28420135186 101% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.191082802548 0.203846283523 94% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.146496815287 0.137316102897 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71016114409 2.80594681477 97% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.037074148 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576433121019 0.56093040696 103% => OK
Word variations: 62.8340621086 60.7387585426 103% => OK
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0891783567 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.9333333333 20.7743622355 101% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1413889929 49.517814964 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.733333333 127.492653851 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9333333333 20.7743622355 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.8 0.814263465372 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38877755511 137% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.99599198397 50% => OK
Readability: 49.5957537155 49.1944974215 101% => OK
Elegance: 1.59139784946 1.69124875643 94% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.481552133018 0.332605444948 145% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.086822164806 0.102741220458 85% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0507636894696 0.0668466124924 76% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.625538425919 0.534860350844 117% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.14064753894 0.148594505496 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.190113959385 0.134430193775 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0781176256746 0.0742795772207 105% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.162437074156 0.324371583561 50% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0591585110104 0.0638462369009 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.261342759577 0.228012699653 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112061219588 0.058150111329 193% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.68436873747 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.41683366733 88% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 5.90881763527 85% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 2.5751503006 155% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 1.9629258517 102% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 10.4468937876 105% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.