Some people claim that not enough of the wastes from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a large requirement.
In this day and age, one of the catastrophic problems that governments are faced with is recycling the households' refuse, which seems like an insurmountable issue. There are some group of people who believe that pass a law on recycling by dwellers is the first and last solution for governments. While I agree that this is true in practical terms, I believe that there are some beneficial and convenient measures that can be taken besides legislation to resolve the trouble.
Some people claim that forcing citizens to abide the law of recycling their wastes and separating their refuses is the only way to increase these utilitarian works; nevertheless, in retrospect, and with the benefit of hindsight, it seems that this method should be substituted with encouragement, giving awareness, and educating. Needless to say that authorities should consider some positive points for household recycling such as tax-free or at least lower amount of tax as a reward. Furthermore, by improving public awareness about the crucial effect of dumping trashes on nature through mass media and educating youngsters to be able to use some sustainable methods for recycling can reduce societies' expenditures markedly.
I believe that introduce some laws to make people consume reusable things and separate their garbage can be acceptable in pressing situations as the most straightforward way. In this way abiding the law can be changed to the habits by passing times and people's interests spontaneously grew in it. However, there are always some people who are neutral about the environment that imposing a fine can be the only way for them to do recycling.
In conclusion, although I can understand the beneficial aspect of legislation on households' wastes recycling, It seems to me that growing public awareness on the importance of this issue and teaching youngsters can be more productive and have long-lasting consequences.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-12 | Sonyainch | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | mirolinquency | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | Duong Linh | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-08 | ppatel | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-24 | rahulsd | 73 | view |
- the graph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. 78
- Some people claim that not enough of the wastes from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a large requirement. 78
- living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause social problems, as well as practical problems. to what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 61
- living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause social problems, as well as practical problems. to what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 61
- living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause social problems, as well as practical problems. to what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 180, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'groups'?
Suggestion: groups
...an insurmountable issue. There are some group of people who believe that pass a law o...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, furthermore, however, nevertheless, so, well, while, at least, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1628.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32026143791 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06019360691 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565359477124 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.0797159794 49.4020404114 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 162.8 106.682146367 153% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.6 20.7667163134 147% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229848434346 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0942916966386 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0511769188799 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129450841877 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0695746892255 0.056905535591 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 13.0946893788 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.57 50.2224549098 65% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.17 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.77 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.