Some people claim that public museums and art galleries will be no longer necessary because people can see historical objects and works of art by using a computer. Do you agree or disagree?
People have different views on whether we should maintain art galleries and public museums or not because of the development of technology such as computer in term of displaying historical objects and artworks. Despite the advantages of computer’s applications and services it is indispensable for those buildings to exist and be appreciated.
First and foremost, many art galleries and public museums have played significant roles in tourism industry. Obviously, some must-see spots such as Lourve in France and the British Museum in England have attracted multitude of visitors every years. Closing down these destinations can influence national and international tourism around the world detrimentally as tourists who want to explore a nation’s culture or history cannot find a suitable place for a visit. They can learn about them through computer technology, however when they are travelling, they prefer to opt for a real trip and authentic objects. Moreover, a nation may experience a rise in their income when people continue to have more options on their trip with not only photogenic tourist attractions but also destinations where artefacts and artworks are displayed.
Another reason why proceeding art galleries and museum outweighs the idea of stopping them is because the artworks and artefacts can be preserved under better condition. People will devote their time, finance and energy to retaining the value and quality of those objects in order not to mar them, negatively affecting the work’s conditions and tourists’ experience. If they are only used once for the display on websites, or applications and then stored all the time, they can be ignored by the staff or authorities. Also, this is a great way to show our appreciation and praises to our ancestors and artisans or artists who enthusiastically create those items.
To conclude, even though computers can support the process of information acquisition, the buildings serving with the purpose of proceeding the mankind’s art and past should not be altered or removed wholly.
- Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change Others however think that change is always a good thing Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 80
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the case What can be done about this problem 89
- Some countries are struggling with an increase in the rate of crime Many people think that having more police on the streets is the only way to reduce crime To what extent do you agree 89
- Scientists say that in the future humanity will speak the same language Do you think this is a positive or negative social development 84
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the case What can be done about this problem 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 87, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the process of information acquisition, the buildings serving with the purpose o...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, then, thus, as to, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 10.4138276553 250% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1745.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40247678019 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00047442309 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609907120743 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 534.6 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 37.570212048 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.416666667 106.682146367 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.9166666667 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27701189166 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0922418621608 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.074950009837 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167180951356 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0586937354507 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.91 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.