Some people claim that public museums and art galleries will be no longer necessary because people can see historical objects and works of art by using a computer. Do you agree or disagree?
No one can deny the fact that the internet is widely used over the world. These days, people can use high technology to figure out anything. There is also a tendency for some individuals to believe that museums and galleries are unnecessary. I totally agree with this notion. In this essay, I will discuss two views on this problem.
On the one hand, with the development of high tech in the digital age, people can read and see everything we request using our cellphones. Furthermore, a few years ago, everyone visited the workplace of arts or the historical place all over the world by travelling as tourists. However, most people are satisfied simply watching the old building via the Youtube application and others. For example, one of the most famous vloggers on Youtube named KHOAI LANG THANG. He uses his channel to show people the places he visited, which led to him reaching more followers and viewers, all of which are available for free through an app.
On the other hand, others think travelling and being a tourist is enjoyable, and they like to pay for that. It is kind of a habit for someone to visit museums and galleries. In addition, each ancient place or object represents a milestone in the past and everyone can learn more about human history.
In conclusion, I believe it is not necessary to visit arts institutions in order to see historical items, however I can use technology to view and know about everything and anywhere on this planet.
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why students chose to study at a particular UK university in 1987 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make a comparison where relevant 78
- Demand for food is increasing worldwide What are the causes of this What measures can the international community take to make sure the supply of food is enough 56
- The chart below gives information about the growth of urban population in certain parts of the world including the prediction of the future Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The table below shows the number of motor vehicles per 1 000 inhabitants in eight countries in 1990 and 2000
- The maps below show the changes in a town after the construction of a hydroelectric power dam 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 333, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... will discuss two views on this problem. On the one hand, with the development of...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 630, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h are available for free through an app. On the other hand, others think travelli...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 115, Rule ID: KIND_OF_A[1]
Message: Don't include 'a' after a classification term. Use simply 'kind of'.
Suggestion: kind of
...e, and they like to pay for that. It is kind of a habit for someone to visit museums and ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 300, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...yone can learn more about human history. In conclusion, I believe it is not neces...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, so, as to, for example, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1228.0 1615.20841683 76% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81568627451 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66156952305 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.611764705882 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 389.7 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 91.0367285793 49.4020404114 184% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.636363636 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1818181818 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.63636363636 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245133575644 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0799310566242 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0438762514754 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137624332402 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0464345673907 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.