Some people claim that public museums and art galleries will not be needed because people can see historical objects and works of art by using a computer. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
It is sometimes argued that paying a visit to museums or art galleries is a time waster when the emergence of the Internet is revolutionising the consumption of arts and history. Although the advances of technology, in my opinion, might turn the two subjects into a booming industry, the former cultural institutions still are irreplaceable.
To some extent, I agree that people nowadays can be offered excellent experiences in surfing, finding, and watching any types of art and historical exhibitions online. In fact, online galleries and museums are now becoming popular when they provide a more effective way of cultural consumption than the traditional ones. For example, VR and AI can assemble actual objects of arts and history in many interesting ways. Also, websites and online presentation not only enhance the experience of tech-savvy visitors, but offer an equally free access to arts and history for either low-income or high-class group of people in society.
On the other hand, I believe the traditional exhibitions of art and history cannot be replaced by the integration of technology and contemporary cultural consumption. Firstly, only by visiting those places can people have hands-on experience on the masterpieces and unique historical objects which impossibly are fully-tasted by online exhibitions. Secondly, it offers a great opportunity for tourists or visitors to meet and discuss with local experts who should provide non-searchable and worthy information. Finally, museums and art galleries are a vital destination to encourage social interaction while the Internet has a strange way of making us isolated. Connecting with members of family and friends, meeting new people in public, engaging in conversational topics are only some of indispensable benefits that museums and exhibition centres are surely to provide.
In conclusion, while the advancement in technology has made a great contribution in promoting arts and history to the public, I believe museums and arts galleries still offer visitors valuable resources and experiences that you cannot acquire from the Internet.
- The diagram shows the different stages in the production of woolen goods 78
- 04 08 2016 In many countries people now wear Western clothes suits jeans rather than traditional clothing Why Is this a positive or negative development 84
- Every day millions tons of food are wasted all over the world Why do you think this is hapenning And how can we solve this problem 64
- Some people believe that reading stories from a book is better than watching TV and playing computer games for children To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The diagram shows the process of making soft cheese 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 524, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[5]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'equally free access'.
Suggestion: equally free access
...ience of tech-savvy visitors, but offer an equally free access to arts and history for either low-inco...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, second, secondly, so, still, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 10.4138276553 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1794.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53703703704 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16471674858 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570987654321 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 580.5 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 38.5086570354 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.5 106.682146367 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.75 7.06120827912 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295725500398 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102708031198 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0624742996996 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172684813059 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0411862256823 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 13.0946893788 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 50.2224549098 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.04 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.