It is suggested that primary children should learn how to grow vegetables and keep animals. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
Many argue that primary children should be taught vegetable growing and animal husbandry for their comprehensive development. While this trend has both positive and negative sides, personally, I believe it does more good than harm.
To begin with, Learning to cultivate plants and feed animals has two main drawbacks in terms of its availability and practicality. Firstly, primary children nowadays hardly have an optimal condition to develop those soft skills due to the lack of agricultural land or farms.Take the town children, for example; they usually need to travel long distances to far-flung countrysides or out-of-town farmland to practice those techniques. Secondly, planting and raising species may be redundant since many parents believe their children should be better equipped with specialized knowledge for the sake of their career path. This perception mainly derives from the modernized world and the proliferation of technological-driven jobs, which make those agricultural skills become obsolete.
However, I concur that the aforementioned disadvantages are eclipsed by tangible benefits that those fundamental skills offer. To start with, planting and feeding facilitate children to accumulate hands-on experiences conducive to their survival. To be specific, given the currently increasing unemployment rate in cities, children can opt for manual jobs in rural areas with those practical skills. Furthermore, plants growth and animal husbandry can gradually instill a sense of love for flora and fauna in primary children. As a result, they would be more encouraged to bear environmental protection and nature preservation responsibility.
In conclusion, while acknowledging certain obstacles of plants growth and animal husbandry programs, I believe that the advantages of those training should be given priority, thus, be motivated among primary children for their better-prepared life and environmental consciousness.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-25 | Nina Tsarevich | 56 | view |
| 2023-07-24 | pwlihnkt | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-09 | hieu13092006 | 78 | view |
| 2022-12-07 | yufdtrdfyt | 67 | view |
| 2022-06-08 | quytnee | 78 | view |
- People are living longer than in the past Many people think that this trend is negative for society To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The bar chart shows the percentage of small medium large companies which used social media for business purposes between 2012 to 2016 84
- More companies have opened working areas without walls or barriers on their desks Do the disadvantages of open plan offices outweigh the advantages 61
- Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals and that this money could be better spent on the human population To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 78
- Studying with a group of students in a classroom is more beneficial than learning online at home To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 275, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Take
... the lack of agricultural land or farms.Take the town children, for example; they us...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, as a result, to begin with, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1670.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.94306049822 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26155758503 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644128113879 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.1965410792 49.4020404114 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.166666667 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4166666667 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.1666666667 7.06120827912 186% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183514526846 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0688025473346 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0718946916516 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126648969645 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0341852705344 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 13.0946893788 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.47 12.4159519038 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.4 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.