Some people feel that certain workers like nurses, doctors and teachers are undervalued and should be paid more, especially when other people like film actors or company bosses are paid huge sums of money that are out of proportion to the importance of the work that they do.
-How far do you agree?
-What criteria should be used to decide how much people are paid?
Nobody can deny that there are certain professionals like nurses, doctors and teachers who are essential to the fabric of society, and who should therefore be rewarded accordingly. However, this is seldom the case. When we look at the salaries and fees commanded by certain film stars and actresses and people who run large companies, this does not seem fair.
First of all, not all film stars earn huge sums of money. In fact, at any one time in the UK, for example, roughly 80 per cent of actors are out of work and on top of that the number who are paid so-called ‘telephone number fees’ is ...
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2021-10-02 | lennie.butera | 89 | view |
2020-08-02 | vdrobny | 84 | view |
2018-02-27 | ravigujar123 | 89 | view |
2016-08-25 | ravibharaths | 85 | view |
2015-06-25 | roxanaluca | 58 | view |
- IELTS Task 1 : International students in Canadian province -Syerapke- (rewrite) 60
- The line graph below gives information on cinema attendance in the UK Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information given Study Sample 74
- You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.Write about the following topic:In most countries multinational companies and their products are becoming more and more important.This trend is seriously damaging our quality of life.Do you agree or disagree? 77
- The charts below show the number of Japanese tourists travelling abroad between 1985 and 1995 and Australia's share of the Japanese tourist market. 86
- Nowadays families are not as close as in the past and a lot of people have become used to this Why is this happening Do the advantages of this trend outweigh the drawbacks 64
flaws:
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.031 0.07
Pay attention to coherence.
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 14 15
No. of Words: 269 350
No. of Characters: 1235 1500
No. of Different Words: 165 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.05 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.591 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.569 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 81 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 54 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 36 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 22 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.214 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.799 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.714 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.286 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.534 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.031 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5