Some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods. Others argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packaging. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Packaging plays an important role in preserving food, protecting it from external influences, and transporting food from supermarkets to our homes. However, it can be a stumbling block in the process of environmental protection. Consequently, there is some opinion that manufacturers and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods but from another perspective, customers should avoid buying goods with an influx of packaging. In this essay, I will explore both views and give my opinion.
On the one hand, people need to solve problems from their roots, and in this case, it is the supermarket that distributes all kinds of packaging so it must have the primary responsibility in decreasing the number of packaging. To begin with, it is worth considering that only the quality of the product creates its value, not the wrapping. Therefore, reducing the amount of nylon bags does not decrease the sales because if the quality is good, the shoppers will come back for the second time. Another point worth noting is that markets do not need to eliminate nylon bags, but they can diminish their roles by using alternative substances such as bags made from straw, cloth, and so on. This will not only protect the environment but can also attract customers with these beautiful bags.
On the other hand, if there is only the participation of manufacturers, It does not make sense. Because Using packaging or not is based on the consciousness of each customer. Accordingly, consumers can buy products in bulk so that the products can be packed in a single package. In addition, people place a high value on using biodegradable shopping bags, because we cannot immediately get rid of them, but phase them out gradually.
To sum up, wrapping causes harm to the environment, so both consumers and manufacturers should jointly remove it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-23 | quynhu | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-23 | quynhu | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-17 | RkmsU | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-06 | viviannguyen | 61 | view |
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The chart shows the average number of hours each day that Chinese American Turkish and Brazilian tourists spent doing leisure activities while on holiday in Greece in August 2019 Summarise the information by 67
- Some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods Others argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packaging Discuss both views and give your opinion 67
- Some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods Others argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packaging Discuss both views and give your opinion 67
- Some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods Others argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packaging Discuss both views and give your opinion 56
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The chart shows the average number of hours each day that Chinese American Turkish and Brazilian tourists spent doing leisure activities while on holiday in Greece in August 2019 Summarise the information by 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, consequently, however, if, second, so, therefore, in addition, such as, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1560.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08143322476 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01128393853 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583061889251 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.4546937648 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.428571429 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9285714286 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.92857142857 7.06120827912 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297757789684 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.09021061831 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.12833143826 0.0667982634062 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164627171257 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.130881860786 0.056905535591 230% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.