Some people prefer to eat at food stands or restaurants. Other people prefer to prepare and eat food at home. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
When it comes to eating habits, everyone got his own perspective. Some believe it is preferable to prepare your own meals at home, while others believe it is better to buy them from food stands or restaurants. It is agreed that there’s nothing better than healthy eating habits. This essay will shed light on whether people should buy from food stands or prepare it at home.
Some statics and studies point out, that people who cook more often, rather than those who get take-out, have an overall healthier diet. When you put fresh ingredients together yourself, you have total control over what is going on in your food. That can make a world of a difference to your overall health. As well, it enables you to reconnect with your body as a way of self-care.
On the other hand, other people prefer to buy their own meals for many convenient reasons. Take, for example, TIME! As they say “time is our biggest enemy”. Those who work two full-time jobs, can’t afford the luxury of preparing their own food. Moreover, it is believed by some people that take-out food is tastier.
To conclude, you are what you eat, so pick wisely what you put inside your body. In my perspective, it is healthier to prepare your own meals, as they are low in sodium and have lower risks of causing obesity.
- Take a look at the question and the graph You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The line graph shows visits to and from the UK from 1979 to 1999 and the bar graph shows the most popular countries visited by UK residents in 1999 Summarize the info
- The charts show average levels of participation in education and the highest education level of adults from 2000 to 2010 in Singapore 67
- Some people say that the increasing use of modern technology has made work a lot easier and quicker to accomplish Others however argue that it has only made people busier 11
- The graph shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features making comparisons where relevant 70
- The diagram below shows the process by which bricks are manufactured for the building industry Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rom food stands or prepare it at home. Some statics and studies point out, that...
^^^^
Line 2, column 259, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'makes'.
Suggestion: makes
...what is going on in your food. That can make a world of a difference to your overall...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... with your body as a way of self-care. On the other hand, other people prefer t...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 122, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...nient reasons. Take, for example, TIME! As they say “time is our biggest enemy”. T...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... people that take-out food is tastier. To conclude, you are what you eat, so pi...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, well, while, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1068.0 1615.20841683 66% => OK
No of words: 230.0 315.596192385 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.64347826087 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33529668051 2.80592935109 83% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.613043478261 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 321.3 506.74238477 63% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.4019170609 49.4020404114 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 76.2857142857 106.682146367 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4285714286 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.35714285714 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3371589538 0.244688304435 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103750313793 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0810563707273 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187304310724 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0896307374972 0.056905535591 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.6 13.0946893788 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 50.2224549098 144% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.3001002004 64% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 12.4159519038 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 78.4519038076 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.