Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change. Others, however, think that change is always a good thing.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
You should write at least 250 words.
There are various viewpoints on the question of whether the ways of living is stable or not. While many people agree with stability life, I would argue that changes also have some positive aspects.
On the one hand, some people are interested in consistent life and avoid any changes. This is simply because it is difficlut to be adopted completely to new situations and it can confront unpredicted risk when varied their way of living. For example, many who decide to alter their occupation to increase income without concerning what will happen in their future. Therefore, this process may be considered a tricky stage so that residents prefer to remain in the same situation instead of being challenged by new things to fulfill their desires.
On the other hand, from my perspective, it is worthy changing their daily routine despite several difficulties may encounter. In some cases, they claim that a new environment can given a potential opportunity to build their lives better and better gradually. For instance, Thomas Edison who is a famous scientist with various useful inventions during his life-span. Based on the former telephone of Gorham Ben, he continued to develop a carbon radio which is a fundamental approach and principle for modern telephone regardless of thinking about whether it would contribute to better life or worthless item. Fortunately, this brought a significant contribution and being an indispensable products in our lives.
To sum up, a routine lifestyle is one of common tendency of some whereas the other believe that inspite of numerous preventing obstacles, they will prepare well for a higher quality of life. Also I am a big fan of the later opinions.
- The graph shows the spending on research into renewable energy of four countries from 1975 to 2000 89
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 78
- The chart below shows global sales of the top five mobile phone brands between 2009 and 2013 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make co
- The charts below show the comparison of some kinds of energy production of France in 2 years
- The graph shows estimated oil production capacity for several Gulf countries between 1990 and 2010 10
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 33, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
There are various viewpoints on the question of whether the ways of living is stable or not. Wh...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 180, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[3]
Message: Did you mean 'give' or 'be given'?
Suggestion: give; be given
..., they claim that a new environment can given a potential opportunity to build their ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 689, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'product'?
Suggestion: product
...contribution and being an indispensable products in our lives. To sum up, a routine l...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 192, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...pare well for a higher quality of life. Also I am a big fan of the later opinions.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, therefore, well, whereas, while, for example, for instance, in some cases, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1424.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12230215827 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81329001234 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.647482014388 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 456.3 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.8026876012 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.538461538 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3846153846 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.76923076923 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152337721085 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0482358352015 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0343022253969 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0836774605519 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0267523179216 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.73 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.