Some people prefer to work for a big company instead of a small, family-run, business. What are the advantages and disadvantages?
It is widely acknowledged that job seekers tend to apply to prestigious companies instead of working for unknown facilities or family-run ones. From my perspective, while laboring for huge industries as opposed to small-scale companies can be beneficial, the drawbacks of this should be taken into consideration.
On the one hand, there are several reasons why working for a vast business can be beneficial, the most significant of which are to improve qualifications and experience learning from the best. With regard to the former, a huge company will enhance the level of staff to increase work productivity. For example, they will invest in a lot of training courses about professional skills for employees. And these courses will help staff expand their horizons at work. When it comes to the latter, a large company typically attracts a pool of contingent employees' talent. For instance, working with excellent people results in having the opportunity to gain plenty of knowledge about different areas.
Contrarily, laboring in a large industry can have some demerits associated with bureaucracy and stiff competition. When it comes to the first idea, the upper echelon works irresponsibly and bullies staff. For instance, they use their power to force employees to work with high intensity. As far as the second point is concerned, the huge business is the place where staff are ready to combat for their promotion position with the pressures of high work. For example, It’s not uncommon to witness staff who are willing to do mountain projects to fulfill the assigned responsibilities by their superiors.
In conclusion, I am inclined to believe that despite the positive effects that working for a large company can exert, the negative implications should not be underestimated.
- The chart below shows the percentages of males and females with higher education qualifications in five countries in 2001 73
- The bar chart below shows shares of expenditures for five major categories in the United States Canada the United Kingdom and Japan in the year 2009 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 87
- SOME PEOPLE THINK GOVERNMENTS SHOULD CARE MORE ABOUT ELDERLY WHILE OTHERS THINK THEY SHOULD FOCUS ON INVESTING IN EDUCATION FOR YOUNGER PEOPLE DISCUSS BOTH VIEWS AND GIVE YOUR OWN OPINION 73
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart below shows the annual rice production in 4 countries in 1995 2005 2015 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 549, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
...typically attracts a pool of contingent employees talent. For instance, working with exce...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1514.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31228070175 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03442037081 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59649122807 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6024451007 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.142857143 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3571428571 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250281985161 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.083717529327 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0510014219844 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151708259597 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0460001206303 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.