Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required.
Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
Some community claim that the increase of total workout facilities is he great way to boost up public health. While others think that the effect on public health would be less impacted and another measures would be compulsory.
The amount of work out facilities have a positive relation with the total of people who exercise regularly. First of all, if there is an increase in new arena to exercise, people will not be bored with their monoton exercise. People tend to manage their workout schedule to do different types of exercise in each arena. Regarding to this, they would exercise more often and this could make them healthier. Second of all, people is a social human being, They should interact with one another and could not live alone. This basic idea is a proof that people wold ask their friends or relatives to join exercise regularly. This could increase the amount of healthy people by work out together.
However, healthiness is not measure with only exercise or doing sports. There are still many other factors that influence someone's health, such as diet, some researches said that having diet is more important than just doing exercise . For instance, people who consume more vegetables and fruits would be healthier than people who exercise regularly while still eating junk food. This is a proof that the increase of sport facilities will be wasteful. Because it depends on people's theirself to be healthy.
To sum up, there are significant positive impacts and drawbacks ought to the increase of work out facilities. However, I personally agree that this would not have much effect on public health. Because it would be a waste if they do not concern about food the consumed.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-19 | Amila Priynatha | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-05 | Leeinho | 89 | view |
| 2019-11-27 | MHT | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-06 | Gholamirayaneh | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-01 | junjunh | 78 | view |
- The pie chart below show recycling in Sydney Melbourne and Worldwide 87
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone call in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.Summarise the information by selecting a reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002. 73
- The line graph shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required.Discuss both these views and give yo 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 234, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... more important than just doing exercise . For instance, people who consume more v...
^^
Line 5, column 453, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e of sport facilities will be wasteful. Because it depends on peoples theirself to be h...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, regarding, second, so, still, while, for instance, such as, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1419.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96153846154 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42178577004 2.80592935109 86% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552447552448 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.1898362855 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 83.4705882353 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8235294118 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.05882352941 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250232863296 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0886135746367 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0781012500617 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183611976474 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0699646565 0.056905535591 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.