The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.

Essay topics:

The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.

From the table we can see the progressions of some UK telecommunication group. It is showing that the some comunication system rise up in 1995 until 2002.

In 1995, more people were using telephone to communicate through local line with around seventy minutes rather than calling through international and mobiles. After several years, in 1999, people still prefer talk through local because at that time communication at that time International and mobile have to pay with high value. Next year, the development of international and mobile were rapidly go up rather than before. In 2000 technology become more modern, the design and produced an excellent communication system. The community were changing slowly. The become more interested in new modern system, 80 UK citizen where from local to international and some after used mobiles also.

UK telecommunication lines and had rapidly rise up from 1995 to 2002 some of the citizen were still using local line all but after community also prefer move to modern communication system and it is increasing mote

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-14 Nguyễn Thành Vinh 73 view
2020-01-06 aghasaeed 78 view
2019-12-22 rahulsd 67 view
2019-12-04 morbymuku 56 view
2019-11-28 Saeed Najd Ataei 78 view
Essays by user romaitoazhar :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 103, Rule ID: THE_SOME_DAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'same'?
Suggestion: same
...unication group. It is showing that the some comunication system rise up in 1995 unt...
^^^^
Line 3, column 399, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'gone'.
Suggestion: gone
...f international and mobile were rapidly go up rather than before. In 2000 technolo...
^^
Line 3, column 613, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e interested in new modern system, 80 UK citizen where from local to internationa...
^^
Line 3, column 615, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'citizen' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'citizens'.
Suggestion: citizens
...interested in new modern system, 80 UK citizen where from local to international and ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 656, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...itizen where from local to international and some after used mobiles also. UK ...
^^
Line 3, column 686, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...ernational and some after used mobiles also. UK telecommunication lines and had ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 44, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'risen'.
Suggestion: risen
...telecommunication lines and had rapidly rise up from 1995 to 2002 some of the citize...
^^^^
Line 5, column 70, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...d had rapidly rise up from 1995 to 2002 some of the citizen were still using local line all...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 153, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...line all but after community also prefer move to modern communication system and ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, still

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 896.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23976608187 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00937286209 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573099415205 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.0241035337 43.030603864 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.5555555556 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.22222222222 5.23603664747 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 9.0 1.69756097561 530% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12392608961 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.055738918556 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0537898697131 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106014415585 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0367588829749 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 61.2550243902 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.