Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end hunger and poverty while others say that it damages the environment and it should be stopped. Discuss + give opinion.
Today, people in many countries have been direct beneficiaries of explosive economic growth. Many believe that it is the sole method to remedy the problems of impoverishment and hunger while others argue that it should be stopped due to its devastating effects on the environment. Personally, I incline to the former notion as this development allows people to have jobs and governments to subsidize the poor.
Those who see economic growth as a threat to the environment propose one major green issue, which is air pollution. It is true that economic development implies higher output, which means that countries have to produce more to either for their residents or for worldwide. In order to meet the growing demand, they may have to consume a greater amount of non-renewable energy such as coal and petroleum, leading to air pollution. For instance, research has shown that China relies on coal power for nearly 70% of its energy and due to this, the country has the poorest air quality in the world.
On the other hand, I agree with those who contend that only economic growth is viable to tackle hunger and poverty for two main reasons. First, the development provides people with more job opportunities so that they could meet basic necessities of life. To elucidate, as firms will produce more goods and services, more labour is required and as a result, the unemployment rate would possibly fall. Second, a rise in the national budget allows the government to subsidize more impoverished people. They will be accommodated with fundamental things such as house, food and clothes to facilitate their life. To exemplify, the Great Vietnam Famine, which occurred in 1945, had led to thousands of dead people due to a lack of food; however, thanks to the government's best endeavor to boost economy that now Vietnam is among the most successful developing countries with more people being able to buy houses, cars and many others necessities.
In conclusion, while economic growth may result in air pollution, I do not think it should be stopped. I believe that this is the only effective method to end famine and destitution.
- Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end hunger and poverty while others say that it damages the environment and it should be stopped Discuss give opinion 73
- Today different types of robots are developed which are good friends to us and help us both at home and work Is this a positive or negative development 84
- Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport Why is it not popular in many places How can its popularity be increased 84
- Tourism has increased so much over the last 50 years that it is having a mainly negative impact on local inhabitants and the environment However others claim that it is good for the economy Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of tourism and give your 84
- Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country What are the reasons Solutions to change negative attitudes 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 229, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
...b opportunities so that they could meet basic necessities of life. To elucidate, as firms will pr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, second, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1787.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 356.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01966292135 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76757533514 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550561797753 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 554.4 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.7494113446 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.133333333 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7333333333 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.26666666667 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189606709146 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0648503333571 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0629688032545 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131137663122 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0592391987842 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.