Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end world poverty and hunger. Others say that economic growth is damaging the environment and should stop. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
One of the growing trends that have gained popularity worldwide is economic development due to its apparent human and social benefits. Although it ensures that the country is out of starvation and poverty in society, others claim that this would have detrimental effects on the environment and should not be perpetuated.
On the one hand, solid economic progress is an optimal way for tackling hunger and poverty. First, the government has enough national budgets to allocate food security and raise living standards, requiring more resources from authorities. In fact, the government increases the national output by collecting more taxes through incentive policies to grow the business to maximise profits. Second, economic prosperity also contributes to significantly reducing the unemployment rate, thus creating more employment opportunities. This means that people make income to afford the basic needs of living things by their abilities.
On the other hand, environmental degradation can arise from investing in the economy. First, factories pollute the air by releasing gas emissions into the atmosphere, or sewage is being discharged into rivers, lakes. If enterprises show concerns for environmental consequences, they would be willing to invest in environmentally friendly technology in order to maximise environmental consequences. Second, the ignorance of the government on allowing enormous projects regardless of ensuring the environment since its benefits, which provide more jobs and pay more taxes for local authorities. The asking of strict regulations to suitable environments acts as a deterrent for attracting the projects or getting development target quickly.
In conclusion, although economic growth is vital to some, protecting the environment is crucial for most. Depending on the conditions and abilities, countries should be able to find their best mix.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ould be able to find their best mix.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, thus, in conclusion, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1626.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.82795698925 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15286713394 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641577060932 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.913376771 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.142857143 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9285714286 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.78571428571 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130705122307 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0449868725327 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0532224214632 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0891965918859 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.04666217401 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.53 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.18 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.