Some people say that it is possible to tell a lot about a person’s culture and character from their choice of clothes.
Do you agree or disagree?
It is argued by some that, peoples types of wear would distinguish the culture and personality of someone. This essay disagrees with the statement because, more than the outfits one's behaviour, attitude and approach to certain circumstances would establish the real man.
Opposers who argued with clothes related to the personal character explains reputed persons who have high social status and privilege may always wear branded and class dresses to identify their identity. Likewise, the majority of people could not afford the prize of modern cloths due to which their culture may elaborate in society by their dress. For instance, celebrities who often wear international dress codes when appear to the audience may showcase their standards in community.
On the other hand, many criminals were pursued the crime by the misconception of societies attitudes towards the well-dressed gentleman. People often cheat the society by the good looking sweat talk to marketing many defrauds. Similarly, low class families who does not have a good dress to wear mostly have the kind heart and humanity to others. They may not have exposure to express their culture and character with regards to the form clothing, though their compassion to the community would be to the core. For instance Mahatma Gandhi, the father of Indian always wear the linen which he made himself.
To sum up, outside appearance may lead to a standard and social status to someone. Nevertheless, compassion and soft heart is greater to understand by the behaviour and manner of the person than the costumes.
- Buying things on the Internet such as books air tickets and groceries is becoming more and more popular Do the advantages of shopping in this way outweigh the disadvantages 78
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.» You should wr 11
- the table below shows the population of three cities in 1990 the population forcast for 2000 and the actual 2000
- Some people think that the range of technology available to people is increasing the gap between the rich and the poor. Others think it has an opposite effect. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 84
- People should focus more on solving problems related to the future, and should not spend time thinking about the past. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 179, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...tatement because, more than the outfits ones behaviour, attitude and approach to cer...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, look, may, nevertheless, similarly, so, well, for instance, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1335.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25590551181 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65729366507 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.594488188976 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 405.0 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.9004875416 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.25 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1666666667 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16102261567 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0584475139731 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0621632673704 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0926079168889 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0497259482727 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.