Few people argued that it is easy to distinguish people culture and behaviour with their choice of dress. I agree with the statement because people often wear costumes with their cultural background and which may showcase their personality.
Many nationalities may differentiate from others through their types of outfits and which may predict their culture and character. Most of the Arabian citizens always wear their traditional dress code not only for official functions but also for daily life. Likewise, many spiritual fathers or nuns may choose their devotional clothes as their public wear too. Such outfits would provide respect to them and their character is often establish by that. Therefore such outfits would differentiate their culture and attitude from the common people who wear casual dresses. It is important among business groups and organization's to wear neat and official outfits in meetings and gatherings to discriminate the standards and personality of members from others.
Nevertheless, it may be argued that clothes would not precipitate the real person attitude and identity. Celebrities and models always wear various kinds of clothes for photo shoots and ads purpose. They are mistakenly sending the matter to the public not relayed to their actual character or personality. It would be their field of work or entertainment therefore, nobody could predict the real character of such persons. Clothes are supposed to be a matter of choice about who is wearing and which occasions are selected to expose. It may not be the character or behaviour it depends upon the situations or purpose of outfits to convey some messages to the whole.
To conclude, even though types of clothes are used for various purposes, it would be discriminate one person to another in terms of culture, nationality and identity.
- Public health is becoming an urgent issue nowadays Some argue that governments should create nutrition and food choice laws to improve public health while others believe that it is a matter of personal choice and responsibility Discuss both views and give 67
- Some people think that there should be some strict controls about noise. Others think that they could just make as much noise as they want. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 78
- The plans below show the site of an airport now and how it will look after redevelopment next year
- Buying things on the Internet, such as books, air tickets and groceries, is becoming more and more popular.Do the advantages of shopping in this way outweigh the disadvantages?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own kn 73
- Some people think that hard working and determination are the key factors for being successful in the life other people feel that other factors are important Discuss both sides what is your opinion 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 453, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...r character is often establish by that. Therefore such outfits would differentiate their ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 571, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... common people who wear casual dresses. It is important among business groups an...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, likewise, may, nevertheless, so, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1551.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31164383562 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78426763712 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513698630137 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.3810077727 49.4020404114 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 103.4 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4666666667 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.8 7.06120827912 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256854370855 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0920435548759 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0437271382016 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151412048679 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0568291087631 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.