Some people say that music is a good way of ringing people of different cultures and ages together.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
It is commonly believed that music brings people together regardless their cultural background and age group. Personally, I completely agree with this point of view.
Firstly, many thinks that contemporary music around the world has no language so it might supplant barriers between people and enjoy all classes of people. In other words, in general, music thrives inside societies when it towards the soul of public because as a people, have the same feeling and music touch that ingredient. Furthermore, listening to music encourages different persons to meet together and understand each other, so music might unite states. For example, western singers from Britain or America have fans eastern countries such as Saudi Arabia as many studies have shown the fascinating of music has a massive effect on reducing problem between people as well as nations. As a result, music has positive impact on listeners and might help in alleviating a challenge that faces grouping individuals.
Another reason to consider is that music has glamour effect on integration of employees or students. Moreover, when employees listen to music in their workplace, this might encourage motivation to compete and improve productivity. In addition, listening to music in schools instill passion between student to work within groups and produce creative ideas. For instance, a study has been conducted in Germany showed that 70% of voters agree that music makes related communities. As consequently, music nurtures a creativity and enthusiasm inside societies and subsidizes integrative businesses.
To sum up, music gathers not only people from different cultures, but also ones from various ages. Music breeds the spirit of cooperation between individuals and increase inspiration.
- The pie chart below shows the main reason why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how there causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s. 56
- The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate fast food in restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 56
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. 84
- The chart below shows global sales of the top five mobile phone brands between 2009 and 2013. 67
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, so, still, thus, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in general, such as, as a result, as well as, in other words, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1498.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52767527675 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81256345725 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630996309963 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6775909613 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.0 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3571428571 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.4285714286 7.06120827912 204% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191946791627 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0698978369515 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0427310799427 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137488924104 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0576524765965 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.94 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.