Some people say that the only reason for learning foreign language is in order to travel or work in a foreign country. Others say that these are not the only reason why someone should learn a foreign language
Discuss both views and give your opinion
In today's competitive world, learning a second language has become more vital than ever. However, whether traveling or working is the only reason for learning is a highly debated issue. This essay will discuss both points of view before coming to the reasonable conclusion.
On the one hand, it is irrefutable that if a person wants a well-paid job, that person should be able to speak at least two languages. In this regard, the fact that working with foreign customers in English, which is one of the main language in the world, would be highly appreciated. Accordingly, the salary of bilingual job would always be higher. Furthermore, if a person learns other languages besides his mother-tongue at the early age, it will enhance opportunity learning as well as travelling oversea. Thus, the idea that working and traveling are the main purpose of learning new languages is undeniable.
Having said that, scientist indicate that cognitive developments happen faster among children who learn a second language than those who do not. More to the point, people who know many languages are capable of reading more books and communicating with more people. Therefore, learning a second language also support people to understand diverse culture and traditional aspects.
In conclusion, although many people learn a second language only for working or traveling, I believe that there are much more benefits.
- car - benefit outweigh drawback 89
- Many people believe that petrol price should be increased in order to direct traffic and pollution. Do you agree 78
- Car - benefit outweigh drawback? 78
- People believe that they should be able to keep all the money they earn and should not pay tax to the state. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- Parents often given childen everything they ask for and do what they like. Is it good for children? What are the consequence when they grow up? 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, besides, furthermore, however, if, second, so, therefore, thus, well, at least, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 41.998997996 52% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1188.0 1615.20841683 74% => OK
No of words: 226.0 315.596192385 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25663716814 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78954842044 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.610619469027 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 367.2 506.74238477 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.8831888819 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 99.0 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8333333333 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3333333333 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276089076874 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10080562645 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0719798349629 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171684166066 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0582342737587 0.056905535591 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 78.4519038076 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.