Some people say that people should have a different amount of holidays according to their job. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
It is argued that individuals engaged in various job roles should get to entertain holidays according to the nature of the work. It is agreed that workers who are in a job which is demanding should be provided time off accordingly. This essay will discuss firstly, how some jobs are more tiring than others, and secondly, the fact that certain work profiles allow more vacation time; followed by a reasoned conclusion.
It is indisputable that depending on the type of work, some jobs can be extremely exhausting when compared to others. Office or desk jobs, for instance, are definitely less exhausting than professions such as mine workers, construction workers or teachers. Based on my personal experience, teaching students, especially teenagers can be incredibly exhausting than other jobs. Hence, certain jobs deserve more time off than others.
Similarly, some jobs which are only performed during certain months/periods of the year allows people to take a longer time off from work. Jobs like forest fire fighting or fruit picking can only be done in summer. This allows them to have a longer duration off from the work. According to a daily newspaper, it is estimated that 20% of the workforce engaged in seasonal jobs get to enjoy more time as holidays when compared to regular jobs.
In conclusion, time off from work should be determined based on the type of the work as some can be extensively exhausting and some would give the opportunity to enjoy more free time because of the seasonal labour.
Fri Aug 02 2019
- Today large shopping centers and supermarkets are more common than small local shops Is this a negative or positive development 56
- It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct e g Dinosaur dodos There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening Do you agree or disagree 56
- These charts below show the percentage of residential water use for five aspects in the UK in 1988 and 2008 67
- The charts below show qualification of graduates working in one advertising company in the year 1990 and 2010 67
- The plan below shows a city in 1950 and the city now 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, first, firstly, hence, second, secondly, similarly, so, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1277.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98828125 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72598881411 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 176.041082164 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.54296875 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 402.3 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.2567744392 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.2307692308 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6923076923 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07692307692 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147052426936 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0578465906954 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0412865420249 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0980513367835 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0513372807674 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.