Some people say that the teaching method with a teacher and students in a classroom will not exist by the year 2050.
To what extend do you agree or disagree?
With the advance of modern technology, every aspect of life has been changed considerably. Robots or AI appear, which persuades people that human teachers will no longer exist in 2050. I totally disagree with this viewpoint as they hold values that cannot be found in programmed machines.
In the first place, the main discreapancy between a human and a robot is the sympathy. Even though an artificial teacher can lecture for a long period of time without feeling exhausted with an immense reservoire of knowledge, it surely lacks the ablility to read students' mind. In contrast, a human teacher does not only teach but also listens to their stories so that he can understand learners at a deeper level. It is significant to remember that only by listening and sympathizing can a teacher discover students' actual needs. This makes learning become a humane process.
Secondly, as a robot does not have emotion, it cannot create an environment where people establish a close bond. It is often mistaken that learners only need knowledge. However, this is not enough. A child coming to class mainly because he or she wants to communicate and have fun with classmates. Happiness is the feeling that every school is supposed to generate. With a non-sense robot, there is no way to achive this goal.
There are some parents who advocate AI instead of human teachers believe that thei children may be safer with a machine on the grounds that no corporal punishment will be applied. It is true that the robot may not be set to punish students, even in the slightest form. Nevertheless, learners should be taught to take responsibility and in some cases, punishing is unavoidable. It is like the fact that every country needs prisons for criminals.
In conclusion, robots may replace teachers in some parts of the traditional teaching process, but they will never take the emotional and spiritual role as excellently as qualified teachers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-15 | Ha23121183 | 84 | view |
- Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in the present.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- Nuclear power is a necessary evil Despite the potential human and environmental consequences of radioactive fall out nuclear energy is a genuine alternative to non renewable energy source Do you agree or disagree 90
- The pie charts below show electricity generation by source in New Zealand and Germany in 1980 and 2010 Summarise the infomation by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 85
- The graph shows Underground Station passenger numbers in London.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- The graphs below show the types of music albums purchased by people in Britain according to sex and age.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 145, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...tificial teacher can lecture for a long period of time without feeling exhausted with an immen...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 552, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to become'
Suggestion: to become
...dents actual needs. This makes learning become a humane process. Secondly, as a robo...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, in conclusion, in contrast, in some cases, it is true, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1612.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9907120743 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77239007158 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597523219814 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.0699056898 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.8421052632 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.63157894737 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173268308675 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0442111763643 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0482268576197 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0985033448028 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0431824962013 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.