Some people say team sports (football) have lots of benefits. Others say Individual sports (swimming, tennis) are better. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is disputed whether individual or team sports which iare more superior. Each type of sport has its benefits and drawbacks which will be discussed below.
On the one hand, sport players only focus on themsleves, there is no need to work with other partners. This relives people of the constraints of supporting other players and enables them to pay attention to practice and increase their own performance. As a consequence, sport enthusiasts could become professional athletes and achieve extraordinary results even though they could originate from less popular sporting background. Take Nguyen Quang Liem, a Vietnamese professional chess player, who once ranked top 20 of the world. Despite the fact that chess is not famous and prioritised in Viet Nam, the players is yet one of the best global chess players. In addition, sports designed for individuals seem to be less demanding in terms of skills as well as strategy. Apart from requirements of physiques, intelligence and other components to join in any particular sport, team activities demand people to coordinate with others, and follow the tactic as a team which many beginners may find it hard to follow. By contrast, it would be much simplier for people to take part in one-person sport which generally less demanding.
On the other hand, sports for some people play at the same time also have a wide range of merits. First, the involment of some players together in sports encourages one's ability to cooperate with others in their daily life. Every person on the field has his or her roles, and each position contributes differently to the victory of their team. The concept is similar in people's normal life and work at which people have to support their loved ones or coleagues by communicating, eliminating the pressure from competitors and so forth. Secondly, gathering in sport group provides people with a place to socialize, which can not be found in sports for individuals. Players can make friends and establish intimate relationships with like-minded people in their team. Expansion of social circle in turn ameliorates effects of stress and gives them a sense of happiness. Thus, playing in team sport not only teaches people how to deal with issues as a team but allows them to communicate with others effectively.
In sum, sports for group or individual has the same nature, they motivate people to exercise more and lead to mental and physical benefits. I believe that people should choose which activities to do based on their interest and ability.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-30 | tieuquynh | 84 | view |
| 2022-10-03 | Charles Le | 84 | view |
| 2022-10-03 | Charles Le | 84 | view |
- Nowadays people depend on technology for leisure activities Is this a positive or negative development 78
- Young people are often influenced in their behaviours and situations by others in the same age This is called peer pressure Do the disadvantages of peer pressure outweigh the advantages 84
- Many employees may work at home the modern technology Some people claim that it can benefit only workers not employers Do you agree or disagree 67
- Families who send their children to private schools should not be required to pay taxes that support the state education system To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 56
- The expansion of multinational companies and increase in globalization produce positive effects to everyone To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 165, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...e players together in sports encourages ones ability to cooperate with others in the...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, well, apart from, in addition, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 41.998997996 160% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2115.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 418.0 315.596192385 132% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05980861244 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52162009685 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77554958722 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 176.041082164 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566985645933 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 642.6 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0823169733 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.75 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 8.67935871743 196% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262590735732 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.085765474968 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0508689850125 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168988821458 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0432546542934 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.