Some people say that technologies such as mobile phones are distributing social interactions.
To what extend do you agree or disagree.
Definite part of the world’s population considers that technologies like mobile phones are degrading reciprocally between people in society. In this essay I will write about points for and against this concept and in the end give my own opinion.
It is not difficult to note that large quantity of people utilize mobile phones as adults, likewise and children. Mobile phones are very necessary and compulsory for each person. For instance, there are such situations when we need to send photography of something to somebody or a person who resides on the other side of the world. Technologies help us make contact with relatives or close people not only by voice calls but also video calls, it is very available and convenient for most people. Besides connecting with other people mobile phones can serve as books for booklovers. For example, who likes books very much especially books of foreign writers it is very profitable and readeble to download very different and unique books written by various authors from the whole world. It does not require any amount of money and it is very fast procedure. In addition, it is optional and permissive to lost time to looking for needful and indispensable books.
However, technologies are not always weal and benefit for people, specifically for children. Firstly, mobile phones are waste of our valuable and essential time. People cannot observe how their time flews by when they use telephone. Secondly, they begin prefer to communicate with people virtually with help of the internet. For example, they become more introvert and uncommunicative in real society. Thirdly, mobile phones are harmful and pernicious for children. They play a lot of games and kill their time that they could spend on studying or pastime with friends in real life. They become dependent on telephones. Moreover, it is adverse and bad for health of young exactly for their eyes as well earphones are also harmful and deleterious for ears.
To conclude, I agree with given idea that mobile phones destroy our interplay with society. It will be better if we appreciate our real and live communication with our close and significant people than virtual box
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-17 | Fatehaulakh09 | 84 | view |
- Children are now less active in their free time than in the past Therefore sports lessons must be compulsory in schools To what extend do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or exper 78
- Children are now less active in their free time than in the past Therefore sports lessons must be compulsory in schools To what extend do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or exper 77
- The chart below show household spending patterns in two countries between 1980 and 2008 67
- TASK 1 11
- Although there is a lot of translation software available learning a language still could be advantageous To what extent do you agree or disagree 71
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, however, if, likewise, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, well, for example, for instance, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 10.4138276553 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1825.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 360.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06944444444 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6791360663 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563888888889 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 585.9 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.7383220645 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.9047619048 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1428571429 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.47619047619 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136138559072 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0504024818047 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.051602384425 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0906489734589 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.014760289844 0.056905535591 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.