Some people say that technologies such as mobile phones are disrupting social interaction.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Originally, technologies are said to have been created to make people’s lives easier. However, decades later, this idea has become a concern, leading to worries that such devices as phones or laptops are breaking communications apart within society. This essay agrees that technological marvels have become more of an entertainment for people rather than a tool to ease their troubles in their daily routines, although these “toys” have the full capacity of making distant people closer to one another within a click of a button.
First and foremost, the creation of computers was planned to fire the torch of advancement where people were thought to pioneer the world of the unknown. However, from the moment of commercialisation of the technology they were branded and customer-driven devices, meaning full dependency on what a client dictates. In turn, it led to the creation of more games and discrepancies of media-orientated tools to browse them. I understand that a device should have all the conveniences of a modern era, yet these very distractions take up far too much of our time, resulting in us making less contact with our friends, family and close people. Modern apps such as TikTok, Instagram or YouTube are prime examples of such marvels where people spend most of their time and effort.
Another sad part of it is that, despite having all these entertaining apps and whatnot, these devices are more than capable of connecting people disregarding the miles between the two. Take Zoom or Skype as an example; during pandemics, these apps unburdened not only heavy loads of business-related companies but also did so with almost all educational institutions across the world.
To sum it up, Innovations are meant to facilitate the lives of millions and bring comfort into their daily lives by making them feel closer however much apart they are. Disregarding these may only be equal to losing oneself in virtual life and disabling real connections we have.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-17 | kashyap sahil | 56 | view |
| 2022-11-04 | shohruh.fayzulloyev | 89 | view |
| 2022-11-04 | shohruh.fayzulloyev | 89 | view |
| 2022-11-04 | shohruh.fayzulloyev | 89 | view |
| 2020-08-10 | Daksh3K | 56 | view |
- Some people say that technologies such as mobile phones are disrupting social interaction To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Children are facing more pressures nowadays from academic, social and commercial perspectives.What are the causes of these pressures and what measures should be taken to reduce these pressures? 84
- Some people say that technologies such as mobile phones are disrupting social interaction To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 89
- Nowadays in many families both parents need to have jobs What are some of the problems associated with both parents working and what are some of the possible solutions Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge 64
- Nowadays in many families both parents need to have jobs What are some of the problems associated with both parents working and what are some of the possible solutions Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge 33
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, regarding, so, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1664.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15170278638 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93730232055 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631578947368 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.6614916763 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.666666667 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.9166666667 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.83333333333 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101673037525 0.244688304435 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.038027510598 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0374164192948 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0550634529567 0.151304729494 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0493409950781 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.