Some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given in the protection of wild animals and birds. Do you agree or disagree?
Protecting wild animals and birds is a vital responsibility of both citizens and government systems. While some people argue that we should spend more funds on health issues and climate change than on rescuing endangered animals, I completely disagree with this statement for some reasons.
The first reason relates to the poaching wildlife has become more popular these days. Hunters keep them in captivity to sell them as pets in the market and sell them at an expensive price. For example, most products from wild animals and birds consumed is meat, feather, and horns. This phenomenon implies that no strict law is conducted to prevent illegal actions, and the government completely neglects natural habitats. As a result, each year the number of endangered animals declined and killed.
Moreover, extreme climate change is also a factor that contributes to the threat to animals. For instance, deforestation for intensive farming has had a disastrous effect on safety like landslides and also the lack of fertile land which destroys the natural habitats of threatened animals. Therefore, authorities should pose strict regulations on poaching and hunting, and create a program that aims to enable the recovery of species on the Endangered Species List and to prevent more species from being added to the list through proactive conservation efforts.
In conclusion, the world still lacks the proper arrangement and capital to preserve animals and birds. Moreover, the extinction and illegal trading of organisms are prevailing everywhere. Hence, the given statement does not seem to be rational.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-12 | Anh Thi | 89 | view |
| 2023-02-15 | lehonganh1212 | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-15 | duchuynh | 67 | view |
| 2023-02-13 | lehonganh1212 | 73 | view |
| 2022-11-29 | soji_kab@hotmail.com | 78 | view |
- The diagram shows changes in Felistone in the UL between 1967 and 2001 61
- 18 2 2022 New technologies have changed the way children spend their free tieme Do the advantages outweigh disadvantages 67
- With increasing populations and even growing urban centers many countries are losing their natural beauty spots What benefits are there to protecting places of natural beauty How can this be solved 73
- Some people think that it is better to live in the countryside than in the city To what extent do you agree or disagree with this point 100
- The bar chart shows the types of media that people of different age groups used to get daily news in one country in 2011 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 301, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...bitats of threatened animals. Therefore, authorities should pose strict regulatio...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1356.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 251.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40239043825 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76720116064 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.621513944223 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 414.9 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.8511310112 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.307692308 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3076923077 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.30769230769 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10988380672 0.244688304435 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0382394844846 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0522884414594 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0705393218308 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.064643388191 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.