These days, traffic disasters are a dangerous menace that humans are facing. It is still open to debate whether the main driver of this issue is the sharp increase in the number of vehicles especially motorbikes or just because of man’s fault. Personally, I wholeheartedly suppose that people’s fault plays an integral part in the significant rise in these mishaps
There are fundamental rationales why motorbikes are to blame for traffic accidents. More motorbikes means the congestion is more severe when the main roads witness an immense influx of hundreds commuters who are vacationers or employees. Nevertheless, all of them make an attempt to overtake the car in front instead of being in the queue, which in turn cause the chaos and crash. However, others' means of transportation should not be overlooked since accidents have cropped up everywhere. Airway , for instance, is even considered the most hazardous way of transport causing thousands of deaths per year.
First and foremost, the incremental accidents that caused death are mostly due to adverse behaviors of numerous drivers, specially young people. Over speeding which is a commonplace for the youth, for example, intensely contributes to a drastic rise in the number of this disaster. However, adolescents are considered not mature enough to have an in-depth knowledge on the serious consequences of their in-disciplined actions and easily get away with what they triggered. Moreover, unsafe road environment such as slippery surface and insufficient safety facilities is admitted to serve as external factors in a high number of fatal accidents. Henceforth, it is the responsibility of the government authorities to advance the transport systems which have been in alarming condition.
In conclusion, the reasons from which road accidents are derived are various. However, I strongly believe that citizens need to gain understanding about to deal with several inevitable hardships.
- Some people believe that a gap year between school and university is a good idea while others disagree strongly Consider both sides of this debate and present your own opinion 67
- Students learn far more with their teachers than other sources Internet or television To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- As major cities in the world are growing today so do their problems What are problems for young people who are living in the cities as the result of continued growth How problems might be solved 61
- The illustrations show how chocolate is produced Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features 11
- Many doctors say that people in today s world do not do enough physical exercise What do you think are the causes of this What solutions are there to this problem 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 34, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
These days, traffic disasters are a dangerous menace that humans are facin...
^^
Line 3, column 205, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...an immense influx of hundreds commuters who are vacationers or employees. Nevertheless,...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 497, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...dents have cropped up everywhere. Airway , for instance, is even considered the mo...
^^
Line 7, column 153, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...itizens need to gain understanding about to deal with several inevitable hardship...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, look, moreover, nevertheless, so, still, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1662.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48514851485 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06422904721 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.650165016502 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.0047570025 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.714285714 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6428571429 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.71428571429 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235973059236 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0657395105373 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0511833192559 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119461091299 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0445871718638 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.79 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.