Some people say that what individuals protect the environment cannot make a difference. Other people say that every individual should take responsibility for it. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Nowadays, there exists a growing belief that the responsibility to preserve the environment should fall upon every individual, regardless of their positions, ages and genders. However, people are not in complete accord about whether it is effective or not to put everyone in charge of environmental protection. This essay discusses both of these views in greater detail, and takes the view that everybody should be responsible for conserving the environment.
On the one hand, there is no denying the fact that some environmental problems such as global warming and extreme weather events are too grave to be mitigated within any individuals’ power. Instead, tackling these acute issues should really depend on the power of officials such as politicians or governments and international assistance. Only governments can call for resources, funds and supplies from multinational corporations and other nations. Additionally, in order to deal with these challenges comprehensively and thoroughly, more scientific research should be conducted, which is really time-consuming and requires advanced technology and enormous efforts of scientists. Meanwhile, carrying out this is undoubtedly infeasible to every person
Although there are reasons why people cannot deal with major environmental issues, I am inclined towards the idea that every individual should take charge of protecting the environment. First and foremost, just small and everyday actions of individuals make positive differences to the environment .Take, for example, Earth Hour which is held annually with the aim to encourage citizens across the globe to switch off electricity for one hour. As a result, Earth Hour has by far saved substantial hectares of lands, proving that each person’s action acts as a catalyst for drastic changes. This is the most important reason, as such alterations cannot be made in bureaucrats’ pockets alone. Secondly, apart from the general public, celebrities can take full advantage of the star power so as to heighten the public awareness. By way of illustration, those in the limelight have raised the funds to combat environmental issues thanks to their followers’ support. By contrast, the authority cannot be so influential to the public compared to stars.
In conclusion, it is justifiable for people to hold the belief that as opposed to the authority, normal people are unable to deal with particular environmental issues. However, I maintain that everybody should be responsible for the environmental protection on the grounds that officials’ impact is eclipsed by that of all individuals
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-28 | An Hai Nguyen | 78 | view |
- In many countries today people in cities either live alone or in small family units rather than in large extended family groups Is this a positive or negative trend 89
- The increasingly wide use of computers in education has decreased the importance of teachers roles in the classroom To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- In many countries today people in cities either live alone or in small family units rather than in large extended family groups Is this a positive or negative trend 78
- In many countries today people in cities either live alone or in small family units rather than in large extended family groups Is this a positive or negative trend 61
- Many people believe that the current system of both teachers and students in the classroom will no longer exist by the year 2050 To what extent do you agree with this opinion 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 626, Rule ID: NEEDS_FIXED[1]
Message: "requires advanced" is only accepted in certain dialects. For something more widely acceptable, try 'advancing' or 'to be advanced'.
Suggestion: advancing; to be advanced
...h is really time-consuming and requires advanced technology and enormous efforts of scie...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 298, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... positive differences to the environment .Take, for example, Earth Hour which is h...
^^
Line 5, column 300, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Take
...ositive differences to the environment .Take, for example, Earth Hour which is held ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 717, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...pockets alone. Secondly, apart from the general public, celebrities can take full advantage of...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 787, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...n take full advantage of the star power so as to heighten the public awareness. By way o...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, really, second, secondly, so, while, apart from, as to, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2220.0 1615.20841683 137% => OK
No of words: 397.0 315.596192385 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5919395466 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46372701284 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21597665125 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 176.041082164 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589420654912 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 687.6 506.74238477 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5957092398 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.75 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8125 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274986179042 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0774710747482 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0652723062837 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169363018324 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0516356059656 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.44 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.96 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 78.4519038076 164% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.