To some people studying the past is the best way to help young people function well in the modern world. To what extent do you agree or disagree? What other measures could be effective in helping young peole to function well in the modern world?
Number considerations that youngsters should take advantage of the study of history to be able to survive in the modern world. I believe that historical events bring numerous benefits to help late generations adapt to present-day life.
It is clear that studying history plays a critical role in the adaptation of budding people to the modern period. It helps them to broaden their historical knowledge about the origin of their ancestors. Since the antiqued, humans are known to have evolved from gorillas. Accordingly, if young generations study the evolution of humanity in the past, they will be able to improve the DNA of humanity. In addition, when they are interested in history, this provides them with a large amount of necessary information to prevent past issues from occurring. For example, there are serious consequences of world war such as famines so the majority of countries try to compromise to keep the peace.
There are a plethora of solutions to help new generations approach modern life easier. Initially, they should broaden their knowledge in a number of various fields by reading books and newspapers frequently on the Internet. By doing this, they will obtain and be capitalize on a wide range of knowledge and good problem-solving ability to confront future events. Besides, learning well-knowledge and experience from predecessors is a well-calculated move with them which advance their deliberate, capable agile, and thought-out behaviors.
In conclusion, undeniably historical study effectively affects the adaptation of inexperienced people to the modern world. This factor is predicted to have far-reaching effects significantly on youngsters' behaviors.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 540, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pable agile, and thought-out behaviors. In conclusion, undeniably historical stu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, besides, if, so, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1437.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52692307692 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16641725375 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.0488822579 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 102.642857143 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5714285714 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214407041483 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0689961839564 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0599641310263 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131442075221 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0242446230813 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.