Some people think that all college students should study whatever they like. Others believe they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. Discuss both of these views and give your own opinion.”
While some people believe that students should be allowed to study whatever they like, others argue that college studies should only be limited to practical and prospective fields such as technology and science. In my opinion, I believe that striking a balance between these two ideas would be the best approach.
Advocates of complete freedom of choice in college studies point out that students will likely be dedicated and passionate about their desired studies. When students freely pursue their courses, they are likely to be engrossed in any academic subject, leading to better academic performance and retention of lesson-related information. Additionally, choosing college studies without restriction will enable students to tap into their innate talents and use them to apply to their chosen fields, resulting in a more fulfilling college experience and a greater sense of personal development. For example, a would-be first-year student passionate about Vietnamese literature may take a course in Vietnamese language, poetry and culture. This will help foster a deeper understanding of Vietnamese culture and history and improve Vietnamese language proficiency and critical thinking among students.
Critics of academic freedom buttress the belief that students should be limited to studying practical fields such as science and technology due to their utility in developing human civilization and promising career prospects. As our society grows, especially in the era of Artificial Intelligence, it is imperative to have a tech-savvy youthful future workforce well-equipped with the knowledge of technology and science to keep pace with the rapidly evolving global landscape. Students studying science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) will likely get well-paid jobs and higher career opportunities. A perfect example is the global job market, with a continuously high demand for tech workers and high-paid salaries.
In conclusion, the debate about whether students should study whatever they like or only subjects such as technology or science remains contentious, with valid arguments on both sides. I believe that promoting a balance between the two approaches is feasible and appropriate because the college experience should be
transformative as it enables students to become more informed and well-educated while preparing them for future job demands.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-23 | chinh11111 | 84 | view |
| 2023-02-23 | chinh11111 | 84 | view |
| 2023-02-23 | chinh11111 | 84 | view |
| 2023-01-10 | tranlequihoang | 73 | view |
| 2023-01-10 | tranlequihoang | 73 | view |
- Write an essay about Some people think that all college students should study whatever they like Others believe they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future such as those related to science and technology Discuss both of 84
- It is important for government to spend public funds on promoting a healthy lifestyle than treatment of people who are already ill Do you agree or disagree 78
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote environments such as the south pole Do you agree or disagree with this development 78
- More people put their personal information online e q address telephone number for everyday activities such as socializing on social networks or banking purposes is this positive or negative development 79
- Nowadays celebrities are more famous for their glamour and wealth than for their achievements and this sets a bad example to young people To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... two ideas would be the best approach. Advocates of complete freedom of choice ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and critical thinking among students. Critics of academic freedom buttress the...
^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... tech workers and high-paid salaries. In conclusion, the debate about whether ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2045.0 1615.20841683 127% => OK
No of words: 353.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.79320113314 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0228314759 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580736543909 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 641.7 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.3117862512 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 157.307692308 106.682146367 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1538461538 20.7667163134 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.76923076923 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.460440236201 0.244688304435 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153515185619 0.084324248473 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.143149675231 0.0667982634062 214% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.256465617908 0.151304729494 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.159537922313 0.056905535591 280% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.4 13.0946893788 148% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 50.2224549098 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.6 12.4159519038 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.34 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 78.4519038076 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.