Some people think all University students should study whatever they like. Other believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinions.
Schools, colleges and universities are the temple of imparting knowledge, skills and life long lessons. There are plethora of subjects to be studied by the pupils at University courses along with their main subject which can be beneficial in one's career as argued by few civilians, while others opine to study only subjects related to science and technology. Both views are justified further.
To begin with, candidate need to gain the basic knowledge of all the subjects, not only for a change to his particular study but one can develope skills for future plans. To illustrate, if a mechanical engineer do not study the basics of electrical and civil, he would be of no use to operate a machine or to construct a bridge across river. In addition, one has to study the basics of mathematics subject not only to impart its calculations directly but indirectly it can be applied to daily life.
In contrast, language learning at school apart from international and mother tongue is of no use for some students who are only willing to be master in particular subject with a particular course. For them learning subjects apart from their main subjects is a waste of time and resources. One can get a refreshment and additional knowledge is important but it could be burdensome for some. They also states that if learning different subjects makes "Jack of All, Master of None".
In my perspective, one should have knowledge of all the subjects which are taught because there may be reasons for juries to convocate the particular course with different branches in them.
In conclusion, with the above views gaining knowledge is wealth so civilians should go for it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-03 | Darsh_Patel | 73 | view |
| 2019-06-12 | akananepa | 61 | view |
| 2018-06-27 | raeesashaz | 89 | view |
| 2016-09-27 | Malita | 56 | view |
| 2016-09-24 | aldyth | 68 | view |
- Some people think that University students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in future, such as those related to science and technology.Discuss both the views and give yo 73
- This days many people prefer ready to eat food outside to their home rather then home made food do you think this has more advantages or disadvantages. 56
- Some people think all University students should study whatever they like. Other believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.Discuss both these views and giv 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 243, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...main subject which can be beneficial in ones career as argued by few civilians, whil...
^^^^
Line 3, column 279, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...electrical and civil, he would be of no use to operate a machine or to construct a ...
^^^
Line 5, column 401, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'They' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'state'
Suggestion: state
...could be burdensome for some. They also states that if learning different subjects mak...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, while, apart from, as to, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, in particular, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1402.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98932384342 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81057693606 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569395017794 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.5611622342 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.833333333 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4166666667 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.91666666667 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287521702943 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100240505211 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0592887252808 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150764751501 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0657685117148 0.056905535591 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.